Re: [HACKERS] New dot releases

2005-09-20 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:09:50PM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote: > In an earlier message you said that "the owner of the machine has > been completely unhelpful about providing any information to track > it down." Is he not responding at all, or is he responding but > with not enough information? Ye

Re: [HACKERS] New dot releases

2005-09-19 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:53:44AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Devrim GUNDUZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So no need to hold the new dot releases? :) > > I still object to releasing them until we find out what's going on > on gerbil. That machine was building 8.0 fine until the patch, and it's >

Re: [HACKERS] New dot releases

2005-09-19 Thread Tom Lane
Devrim GUNDUZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So no need to hold the new dot releases? :) I still object to releasing them until we find out what's going on on gerbil. That machine was building 8.0 fine until the patch, and it's failing consistently since then. To assume this is not our problem wo

Re: [HACKERS] New dot releases

2005-09-19 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
Hi, On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Michael Fuhr wrote: On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 09:28:39AM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote: FWIW, I have a Solaris 9/sparc box with gcc 3.4.2 (same setup as gerbil) and have no problems with REL7_2_STABLE through HEAD. I'll test REL8_0_STABLE with gerbil's configure options wh

Re: [HACKERS] New dot releases

2005-09-16 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 09:28:39AM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote: > FWIW, I have a Solaris 9/sparc box with gcc 3.4.2 (same setup as > gerbil) and have no problems with REL7_2_STABLE through HEAD. I'll > test REL8_0_STABLE with gerbil's configure options when I get a > chance. I just built REL8_0_STA

Re: [HACKERS] New dot releases

2005-09-16 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 07:57:08AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >What's holding up the back branches at the moment is that the gerbil > >buildfarm member is showing failures in the 8.0 branch that started > >right after I patched the vacuum/ctid-chain stuff. That probably > >indicates a problem

Re: [HACKERS] New dot releases

2005-09-16 Thread Joshua D. Drake
What's holding up the back branches at the moment is that the gerbil buildfarm member is showing failures in the 8.0 branch that started right after I patched the vacuum/ctid-chain stuff. That probably indicates a problem, but the owner of the machine has been completely unhelpful about providi

Re: [HACKERS] New dot releases

2005-09-16 Thread Tom Lane
Devrim Gunduz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > After / before 8.1 Beta 2, are there any plans to release new dot releases > for the back branches? Some day ;-) What's holding up the back branches at the moment is that the gerbil buildfarm member is showing failures in the 8.0 branch that started ri

[HACKERS] New dot releases

2005-09-16 Thread Devrim Gunduz
Hi, After / before 8.1 Beta 2, are there any plans to release new dot releases for the back branches? Regards, -- Devrim GUNDUZ Kivi Bilişim Teknolojileri - http://www.kivi.com.tr devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org

Re: [HACKERS] New dot releases?

2005-07-12 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 16:30:48 +0300, Devrim GUNDUZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Hi, > > There are many commits to back branches and 8.0 branch since the last dot > releases were announced. > > Any plans for new releases before 8.1beta1

[HACKERS] New dot releases?

2005-07-12 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, There are many commits to back branches and 8.0 branch since the last dot releases were announced. Any plans for new releases before 8.1beta1? Regards, - -- Devrim GUNDUZ devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr