On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:09:50PM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
In an earlier message you said that the owner of the machine has
been completely unhelpful about providing any information to track
it down. Is he not responding at all, or is he responding but
with not enough information?
Yes. I
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Michael Fuhr wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 09:28:39AM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
FWIW, I have a Solaris 9/sparc box with gcc 3.4.2 (same setup as
gerbil) and have no problems with REL7_2_STABLE through HEAD. I'll
test REL8_0_STABLE with gerbil's configure options
Devrim GUNDUZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So no need to hold the new dot releases? :)
I still object to releasing them until we find out what's going on
on gerbil. That machine was building 8.0 fine until the patch, and it's
failing consistently since then. To assume this is not our problem
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:53:44AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Devrim GUNDUZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So no need to hold the new dot releases? :)
I still object to releasing them until we find out what's going on
on gerbil. That machine was building 8.0 fine until the patch, and it's
failing
Hi,
After / before 8.1 Beta 2, are there any plans to release new dot releases
for the back branches?
Regards,
--
Devrim GUNDUZ
Kivi Bilişim Teknolojileri - http://www.kivi.com.tr
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org
Devrim Gunduz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After / before 8.1 Beta 2, are there any plans to release new dot releases
for the back branches?
Some day ;-)
What's holding up the back branches at the moment is that the gerbil
buildfarm member is showing failures in the 8.0 branch that started
right
What's holding up the back branches at the moment is that the gerbil
buildfarm member is showing failures in the 8.0 branch that started
right after I patched the vacuum/ctid-chain stuff. That probably
indicates a problem, but the owner of the machine has been completely
unhelpful about
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 07:57:08AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
What's holding up the back branches at the moment is that the gerbil
buildfarm member is showing failures in the 8.0 branch that started
right after I patched the vacuum/ctid-chain stuff. That probably
indicates a problem, but
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 09:28:39AM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
FWIW, I have a Solaris 9/sparc box with gcc 3.4.2 (same setup as
gerbil) and have no problems with REL7_2_STABLE through HEAD. I'll
test REL8_0_STABLE with gerbil's configure options when I get a
chance.
I just built REL8_0_STABLE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
There are many commits to back branches and 8.0 branch since the last dot
releases were announced.
Any plans for new releases before 8.1beta1?
Regards,
- --
Devrim GUNDUZ
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 16:30:48 +0300,
Devrim GUNDUZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
There are many commits to back branches and 8.0 branch since the last dot
releases were announced.
Any plans for new releases before 8.1beta1?
I seem
11 matches
Mail list logo