Folks,
Have received exactly zero feedback on the question of whether I should
be assigning reviewers to WIP patches or not.
--Josh
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
Have received exactly zero feedback on the question of whether I should be
assigning reviewers to WIP patches or not.
I think we should. For example, one of the WIP patches is submitted by
me. One reason I marked it
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 10:58 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
Have received exactly zero feedback on the question of whether I should
be assigning reviewers to WIP patches or not.
I suppose it depends on what exactly WIP means, but I should think
that if work is still in progress, the patch is not
Pavan,
I think we should. For example, one of the WIP patches is submitted by
me. One reason I marked it WIP because I was not sure what is
considered as WIP and what is not. The patch is ready for review, but
of course have some open items and may need further work once I
receive the
Neil Conway wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 10:58 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
Have received exactly zero feedback on the question of whether I should
be assigning reviewers to WIP patches or not.
I suppose it depends on what exactly WIP means, but I should think
that if work is still in
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 14:38 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
But patches in progress still need comments from reviewers.
Certainly, but should this be done as part of the commit fest process?
Commenting on the future direction that an in-development patch ought to
take sounds more like a task for
Neil Conway wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 14:38 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
But patches in progress still need comments from reviewers.
Certainly, but should this be done as part of the commit fest process?
Commenting on the future direction that an in-development patch ought to
take
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 14:38 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
But patches in progress still need comments from reviewers.
Certainly, but should this be done as part of the commit fest process?
Commenting on the future direction that an in-development patch
