On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> Jim Nasby pointed out:
>
>> It'd be useful to us to have a utility that could cleanly validate
>> the server was up and communicating, without having to actually login.
>
> Well sure, but wouldn't it be even more useful to validate at t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Jim Nasby pointed out:
> It'd be useful to us to have a utility that could cleanly validate
> the server was up and communicating, without having to actually login.
Well sure, but wouldn't it be even more useful to validate at the
same time
On 10/4/12 11:34 AM, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
I was wondering recently if there was any command line tool that
>utilized PQping() or PQpingParams(). I searched the code and couldn't
>find anything and was wondering if there was any interest to have
>something like this included? I wrote somethi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
> I was wondering recently if there was any command line tool that
> utilized PQping() or PQpingParams(). I searched the code and couldn't
> find anything and was wondering if there was any interest to have
> something like this included? I wrot
Phil Sorber writes:
> How about adding it as an option to psql? That's not to say that I
> think we shouldn't also add it to 'pg_ctl status'.
> I was looking at the code and originally I was using return code to
> signify what the status was and some text output when quiet wasn't
> set, but psql
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2012/10/3 Phil Sorber :
>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:01:36PM -0400, Phil Sorber wrote:
I was wondering recently if there was any command line tool that
utilized PQping() or
2012/10/3 Phil Sorber :
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:01:36PM -0400, Phil Sorber wrote:
>>> I was wondering recently if there was any command line tool that
>>> utilized PQping() or PQpingParams(). I searched the code and couldn't
>>> find an
Bruce Momjian writes:
> I don't see any tool using PQping except pg_ctl. Perhaps we should
> modify "pg_ctl status" to use PQping. Right now is only checks the
> postmaster.pid file, and checks to see that the pid is a running
> postmaster. What it currently doesn't do is to check if the server
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:01:36PM -0400, Phil Sorber wrote:
>> I was wondering recently if there was any command line tool that
>> utilized PQping() or PQpingParams(). I searched the code and couldn't
>> find anything and was wondering if th
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:01:36PM -0400, Phil Sorber wrote:
> I was wondering recently if there was any command line tool that
> utilized PQping() or PQpingParams(). I searched the code and couldn't
> find anything and was wondering if there was any interest to have
> something like this included?
I was wondering recently if there was any command line tool that
utilized PQping() or PQpingParams(). I searched the code and couldn't
find anything and was wondering if there was any interest to have
something like this included? I wrote something for my purposes of
performing a health check that
11 matches
Mail list logo
