Re: [HACKERS] Patch rev 2: MySQL-ism help patch for psql

2010-01-20 Thread Rob Wultsch
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 5:01 PM, David Christensen wrote: > > On Jan 19, 2010, at 4:23 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 5:14 PM, David E. Wheeler >> wrote: >>> >>> Why would they want more? It's not MySQL, and they know that. If we give >>> them some very minor helpful hints fo

Re: [HACKERS] Patch rev 2: MySQL-ism help patch for psql

2010-01-19 Thread Tom Lane
David Christensen writes: > I also forgot to enclose the sample output in this version, based > largely on Tom's wording for the USE usecase: Please note that that was just an off-the-cuff example, not something I thought was perfect as is ... regards, tom lane -- Sen

Re: [HACKERS] Patch rev 2: MySQL-ism help patch for psql

2010-01-19 Thread David Christensen
On Jan 19, 2010, at 6:01 PM, David Christensen wrote: On Jan 19, 2010, at 4:23 PM, Robert Haas wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 5:14 PM, David E. Wheeler > wrote: Why would they want more? It's not MySQL, and they know that. If we give them some very minor helpful hints for the most common

[HACKERS] Patch rev 2: MySQL-ism help patch for psql

2010-01-19 Thread David Christensen
On Jan 19, 2010, at 4:23 PM, Robert Haas wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 5:14 PM, David E. Wheeler > wrote: Why would they want more? It's not MySQL, and they know that. If we give them some very minor helpful hints for the most common things they try to do, it would be a huge benefit to them