I wrote:
[ concerning a discussion about Kerberos' com_err.h being in
/usr/include/et/ on some systems ]
Actually, I'm wondering why we directly include com_err.h at all. At
least in the version of krb5.h I have here, that file is included by
krb5.h; so both backend/libpq/auth.c and
Tom Lane said:
I wrote:
[ concerning a discussion about Kerberos' com_err.h being in
/usr/include/et/ on some systems ]
Actually, I'm wondering why we directly include com_err.h at all. At
least in the version of krb5.h I have here, that file is included by
krb5.h; so both
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane said:
Accordingly, I think we should just avoid the whole problem of exactly
where com_err.h lives by removing the #includes for it as well as the
configure test for it.
Works for me. I'm not sure why the reasoning only applies to 8.0 - is it
Bernd Helmle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Instead of doing that, do:
--with-includes=/usr/include/et
This same workaround is in the RPMs. I wonder if it would be
worthwhile for configure to
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Instead of doing that, do:
--with-includes=/usr/include/et
This same workaround is in the RPMs. I wonder if it would be
worthwhile for configure to assume the above when --with-krb5 is
mentioned. I don't know how widespread this
--On Montag, Dezember 13, 2004 17:23:06 +0100 Peter Eisentraut
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Instead of doing that, do:
--with-includes=/usr/include/et
This same workaround is in the RPMs. I wonder if it would be
worthwhile for configure
All went mainly well - but a couple of gotchas on the build (these may be
Fedora bugs rather than PG ones). This install is pretty much brand new
(2 days old) with very little local configuration, so should represent an
FC3 out of the box.
1. com_err.h is in /usr/include/et/com_err.h and isn't
John Gray said:
All went mainly well - but a couple of gotchas on the build (these may
be Fedora bugs rather than PG ones). This install is pretty much brand
new (2 days old) with very little local configuration, so should
represent an FC3 out of the box.
1. com_err.h is in
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Instead of doing that, do:
--with-includes=/usr/include/et
This same workaround is in the RPMs. I wonder if it would be worthwhile
for configure to assume the above when --with-krb5 is mentioned. I
don't know how widespread this particular file
