On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Haribabu Kommi kommi.harib...@gmail.com
wrote:
What is the configuration for test (RAM of m/c, shared_buffers,
scale_factor, etc.)?
Here are the details:
CPU - 16 core, RAM - 252 GB
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Haribabu Kommi kommi.harib...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Haribabu Kommi
kommi.harib...@gmail.com
wrote:
What is the configuration for test (RAM of m/c,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Haribabu Kommi kommi.harib...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Haribabu Kommi
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Haribabu Kommi kommi.harib...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Beena Emerson memissemer...@gmail.com
wrote:
I also ran the test script after making the same configuration changes
that
you have specified. I found that I was not able to get
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Beena Emerson memissemer...@gmail.com wrote:
I also ran the test script after making the same configuration changes that
you have specified. I found that I was not able to get the same performance
difference that you have reported.
Following table lists the
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Haribabu Kommi kommi.harib...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sorry for the late reply. Thanks for the test.
Please find the re-based patch with a temp fix for correcting the problem.
I will a submit a proper patch fix later.
Please note that the new patch still gives
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Hannu Krosing ha...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 05/20/2014 01:46 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Haribabu Kommi
kommi.harib...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I Implemented a proof of concept patch to see whether the buffer pool
split can improve
On 05/26/2014 04:16 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Hannu Krosing ha...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 05/20/2014 01:46 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Haribabu Kommi
kommi.harib...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I Implemented a proof of concept patch to see
On 05/20/2014 01:46 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Haribabu Kommi
kommi.harib...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I Implemented a proof of concept patch to see whether the buffer pool
split can improve the performance or not.
Summary of the changes:
1. The priority buffers are
On 5/16/14, 8:15 AM, Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
On 20 Feb 2014, at 01:38, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I am really dubious that letting DBAs manage buffers is going to be
an improvement over automatic management.
the reason for a feature like that is to define an area of the
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Haribabu Kommi
kommi.harib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Haribabu Kommi
kommi.harib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Haribabu
Hello,
I applied the patch to current HEAD. There was one failure (attached),
freelist.rej
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/file/n5804200/freelist.rej
Compiled the provided pgbench.c and added following in .conf
shared_buffers = 128MB # min 128kB
Shared_buffers=64MB
On 20 Feb 2014, at 01:38, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Haribabu Kommi kommi.harib...@gmail.com writes:
I want to propose a new feature called priority table or cache table.
This is same as regular table except the pages of these tables are having
high priority than normal tables. These
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Haribabu Kommi
kommi.harib...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Haribabu Kommi
kommi.harib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Tom Lane
Hi,
I want to propose a new feature called priority table or cache table.
This is same as regular table except the pages of these tables are having
high priority than normal tables. These tables are very useful, where a
faster query processing on some particular tables is expected.
The same
Haribabu Kommi kommi.harib...@gmail.com writes:
I want to propose a new feature called priority table or cache table.
This is same as regular table except the pages of these tables are having
high priority than normal tables. These tables are very useful, where a
faster query processing on
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Haribabu Kommi kommi.harib...@gmail.com writes:
I want to propose a new feature called priority table or cache table.
This is same as regular table except the pages of these tables are having
high priority than normal
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Haribabu Kommi
kommi.harib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I want to propose a new feature called priority table or cache
table.
This is same as regular table except the pages of these tables are
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Haribabu Kommi
kommi.harib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I want to propose a new feature called priority table or cache
19 matches
Mail list logo
