On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Christof Petig wrote:
> Karel Zak wrote:
>
> > > What about parameters? Normally you can prepare a statement and execute it
> >
> > We have in PG parameters, see SPI, but now it's used inside backend only
> > and not exist statement that allows to use this feature in be<->f
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 04:05:50PM +0100, Christof Petig wrote:
> Karel Zak wrote:
> >
> > Please, read my old query cache and PREPARE/EXECUTE description...
>
> Sorry I can't find it in my (current) mailbox, do you have a copy around? Or can
> you give me a keyword?
>
In my archives, there's
Karel Zak wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Christof Petig wrote:
>
> > Karel Zak wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > Well I can re-write and resubmit this patch. Add it as a
> > > > > compile time option
> > > > > is not bad idea. Second possibil
On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Christof Petig wrote:
> Karel Zak wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > Well I can re-write and resubmit this patch. Add it as a
> > > > compile time option
> > > > is not bad idea. Second possibility is distribute it as patch
> > >
Karel Zak wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote:
>
> >
> > > Well I can re-write and resubmit this patch. Add it as a
> > > compile time option
> > > is not bad idea. Second possibility is distribute it as patch
> > > in the contrib
> > > tree. And if it until not good tested
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Karel, where did things stand the last time this was brought up? We
> > haven't gone beta yet, can you re-submit a patch for v7.1 before beta so
> > that we can integrate the changes?
>
> I think it would be
The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Karel, where did things stand the last time this was brought up? We
> haven't gone beta yet, can you re-submit a patch for v7.1 before beta so
> that we can integrate the changes?
I think it would be a very bad idea to try to integrate the query ca
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote:
>
> > Well I can re-write and resubmit this patch. Add it as a
> > compile time option
> > is not bad idea. Second possibility is distribute it as patch
> > in the contrib
> > tree. And if it until not good tested not dirty with this main tree
> Well I can re-write and resubmit this patch. Add it as a
> compile time option
> is not bad idea. Second possibility is distribute it as patch
> in the contrib
> tree. And if it until not good tested not dirty with this main tree...
>
> Ok, I next week prepare it...
One thing that worries
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Karel Zak wrote:
>
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> > > Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Implemented stored proceedures for
> > > postgresql but still hasn't been approached to integrated them.
> >
> > some
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Implemented stored proceedures for
> > postgresql but still hasn't been approached to integrated them.
>
> someone has to approach him to integrate them? *raised eyebr
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Steve Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001031 13:47] wrote:
> >
> > > >(Incidentally, we've toyed around with developping a
> > query-caching
> > > > system that would sit betwen PostgreSQL and our DB libraries.
> > >
> > > Sounds amazing, but
* Steve Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001031 13:47] wrote:
>
> > >(Incidentally, we've toyed around with developping a
> query-caching
> > > system that would sit betwen PostgreSQL and our DB libraries.
> >
> > Sounds amazing, but requires some research, I guess. However, in
> many
> >
13 matches
Mail list logo
