On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> Yeah, random() is the wrong thing. It should use PostmasterRandom().
>> Fixed to do that instead.
>
> I am not very happy about this patch; have you considered the security
>
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Amit Kapila
wrote:
> >> >> Yes, same random number generation is not the problem. In windows
apart
> >> >> from EEXIST error, EACCES also needs to be
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> >> Yes, same random number generation is not the problem. In windows apart
>> >> from EEXIST error, EACCES also needs to be validated and returned for
>> >> new random number generation, instead of throwing an error.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Haribabu Kommi
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Amit Kapila
wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Haribabu Kommi <
kommi.harib...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 4:51 PM,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Haribabu Kommi
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Amit Kapila
>> wrote:
>> >> Operating system - windows 7
>> >> Binary
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Haribabu Kommi
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Amit Kapila
wrote:
> >> Operating system - windows 7
> >> Binary - PostgreSQL 9.5 (This doesn't matter, 9.4+ can produce the
> >> problem)
> >>
> >> 1.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Haribabu Kommi
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Amit Kapila
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >> I am not able to find the reason
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Haribabu Kommi
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Amit Kapila
wrote:
>
>
> >> I am not able to find the reason for this error. This error is
occurring
> >> only
> >> when the PostgreSQL is started as a
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Haribabu Kommi
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Amit Kapila
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Okay, so one probable theory for
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Haribabu Kommi
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Amit Kapila
wrote:
> >
> > Okay, so one probable theory for such an error could be that when there
is
> > already an object with same name exists, this
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Haribabu Kommi
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Amit Kapila
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Haribabu
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Haribabu Kommi
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Amit Kapila
wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Haribabu Kommi <
kommi.harib...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> I tried replacing the random()
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Haribabu Kommi
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Haribabu Kommi
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Haribabu Kommi
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I tried replacing the random() with
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Haribabu Kommi
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I tried replacing the random() with PostmaterRandom() for a test and it
>> worked.
>> This is generating different random
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Haribabu Kommi
wrote:
>
>
> I tried replacing the random() with PostmaterRandom() for a test and it
worked.
> This is generating different random values, so the issue is not occurring.
>
> "Global/PostgreSQL.2115609797"
>
> I feel, we
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Amit Kapila writes:
>> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> Maybe we need to be using PostmasterRandom() rather than random() for
>>> the control segment
17 matches
Mail list logo