[HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] please review source(SQLServer compatible)‏

2014-06-23 Thread Pavel Stehule
2014-06-23 19:22 GMT+02:00 Kevin Grittner : > Vik Fearing wrote: > > On 06/23/2014 04:51 PM, rohtodeveloper wrote: > >> 1.SQL statement support > >> INSERT statement without INTO keyword > >> DELETE statement without FROM keywork > > > > Why would we want this? > > I'm pretty sure that the on

[HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] please review source(SQLServer compatible)‏

2014-06-23 Thread Kevin Grittner
Vik Fearing wrote: > On 06/23/2014 04:51 PM, rohtodeveloper wrote: >> 1.SQL statement support >>   INSERT statement without INTO keyword >>   DELETE statement without FROM keywork > > Why would we want this? I'm pretty sure that the only argument for it is to ease migration of software from other

[HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] please review source(SQLServer compatible)‏

2014-06-23 Thread Pavel Stehule
2014-06-23 18:00 GMT+02:00 Kevin Grittner : > Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > On 06/23/2014 10:51 AM, rohtodeveloper wrote: > > >> Our application will be switched from SQL Server to PostgreSQL. > >> However, a few functions are not supported yet. So we decided to > >> extend it. > >> > >> The function

[HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] please review source(SQLServer compatible)‏

2014-06-23 Thread Kevin Grittner
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > On 06/23/2014 10:51 AM, rohtodeveloper wrote: >> Our application will be switched from SQL Server to PostgreSQL. >> However, a few functions are not supported yet. So we decided to >> extend it. >> >> The functions are as following: >> >> 1.SQL statement support >>   INSER