Re: [HACKERS] SR/libpq - outbound interface/ipaddress binding

2010-02-24 Thread Tom Lane
Stefan Kaltenbrunner writes: > Simon Riggs wrote: >> Not for 9.0, though sounds like a welcome change. > yeah - any objections if I add it to the TODO for now? None, it seems like a reasonable future feature. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pg

Re: [HACKERS] SR/libpq - outbound interface/ipaddress binding

2010-02-24 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Simon Riggs wrote: On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 10:00 +0100, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: While playing with SR/HS in a more complex datacenter environment I immediatly hit the need to being able to specify the ipaddress(or interface) that the backend(or libpq) uses to connect to the master. There ar

Re: [HACKERS] SR/libpq - outbound interface/ipaddress binding

2010-02-23 Thread Simon Riggs
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 10:00 +0100, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > While playing with SR/HS in a more complex datacenter environment I > immediatly hit the need to being able to specify the ipaddress(or > interface) that the backend(or libpq) uses to connect to the master. > > There are a few reas

Re: [HACKERS] SR/libpq - outbound interface/ipaddress binding

2010-02-23 Thread Magnus Hagander
2010/2/23 Stefan Kaltenbrunner : > While playing with SR/HS in a more complex datacenter environment I > immediatly hit the need to being able to specify the ipaddress(or interface) > that the backend(or libpq) uses to connect to the master. > > There are a few reasons for being able to do so lik

[HACKERS] SR/libpq - outbound interface/ipaddress binding

2010-02-23 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
While playing with SR/HS in a more complex datacenter environment I immediatly hit the need to being able to specify the ipaddress(or interface) that the backend(or libpq) uses to connect to the master. There are a few reasons for being able to do so like: * we are now suddenly in a situation