Sent from my iPad
On 02-Aug-2013, at 10:30, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 06:25:44PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
When rebasing a patch that I'm working on, I occasionally forget to
update the oid of any pg_proc.h entries I may have created. Of course
this
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 06:25:44PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
When rebasing a patch that I'm working on, I occasionally forget to
update the oid of any pg_proc.h entries I may have created. Of course
this isn't a real problem; when I go to initdb, I immediately
recognize what has happened.
On 07/08/2013 11:03 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
I don't think rewriting it in Perl is necessary or even desirable. I
don't see anything particularly unportable in that script as it is.
I was under the impression that the
On 07/09/2013 10:40 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 07/08/2013 11:03 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net
wrote:
I don't think rewriting it in Perl is necessary or even desirable. I
don't see anything particularly unportable in that script
On 7/9/13 10:40 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
This is actually a pretty trivial task. Here is a simple perl version:
But that would make Perl a hard build requirement.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
On 07/09/2013 01:55 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 7/9/13 10:40 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
This is actually a pretty trivial task. Here is a simple perl version:
But that would make Perl a hard build requirement.
Well, it already is unless you're not building from git AND you're not
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On 7/9/13 10:40 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
This is actually a pretty trivial task. Here is a simple perl version:
But that would make Perl a hard build requirement.
My opinion is that this script should only run if you've changed some
catalog .h files.
When rebasing a patch that I'm working on, I occasionally forget to
update the oid of any pg_proc.h entries I may have created. Of course
this isn't a real problem; when I go to initdb, I immediately
recognize what has happened. All the same, it seems like there is a
case to be made for having
Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com writes:
... All the same, it seems like there is a
case to be made for having this run automatically at build time, and
having the build fail on the basis of there being a duplicate
This would require a rather higher standard of portability than
duplicate_oids
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
This would require a rather higher standard of portability than
duplicate_oids has heretofore been held to.
Ah, yes. I suppose that making this happen would necessitate rewriting
the script in highly portable Perl.
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 19:38 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
This would require a rather higher standard of portability than
duplicate_oids has heretofore been held to.
Ah, yes. I suppose that making this happen would
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
I don't think rewriting it in Perl is necessary or even desirable. I
don't see anything particularly unportable in that script as it is.
I was under the impression that the final patch ought to work on
Windows too.
On 07/09/2013 11:03 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
I don't think rewriting it in Perl is necessary or even desirable. I
don't see anything particularly unportable in that script as it is.
I was under the impression that the
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 6:55 AM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
When rebasing a patch that I'm working on, I occasionally forget to
update the oid of any pg_proc.h entries I may have created. Of course
this isn't a real problem; when I go to initdb, I immediately
recognize what has
14 matches
Mail list logo
