Theo Schlossnagle wrote:
Kris Jurka wrote:
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Theo Schlossnagle wrote:
Kris Jurka wrote:
Anyway the test exits with
Stuck spinlock (80618e9) detected at ./s_lock.c:355.
on a linux gcc build this exits with
Stuck spinlock (0x5013ad) detected at
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Kris Jurka wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Log Message:
---
Modify Solaris compiler build rules to use the cpp preprocessor, the the
x86 file.
Well it compiles now, but it doesn't seem to work:
Kris Jurka wrote:
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Theo Schlossnagle wrote:
The file that uses the spinlocks:
/src/backend/storage/lmgr/s_lock.c
can be compiled standalone with -DS_LOCK_TEST
To get the test to compile I had to link in tas.o as the attached
patch shows. Unfortunately this doesn't
Kris Jurka wrote:
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Theo Schlossnagle wrote:
What platform is that? (OS rev, architecture and word size)? I
tested the changes I submitted on Solaris 10 amd64.
$ uname -a
SunOS albert 5.9 Generic_112234-03 i86pc i386 i86pc
$ cc -V
cc: Sun WorkShop 6 update 2 C 5.3
Kris Jurka wrote:
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Theo Schlossnagle wrote:
Kris Jurka wrote:
Anyway the test exits with
Stuck spinlock (80618e9) detected at ./s_lock.c:355.
on a linux gcc build this exits with
Stuck spinlock (0x5013ad) detected at ./s_lock.c:402.
This seems like a different
Kris Jurka wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Log Message:
---
Modify Solaris compiler build rules to use the cpp preprocessor, the the
x86 file.
Well it compiles now, but it doesn't seem to work:
http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=kududt=2006-04-28%2016:30:01
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Theo Schlossnagle wrote:
What platform is that? (OS rev, architecture and word size)? I tested the
changes I submitted on Solaris 10 amd64.
$ uname -a
SunOS albert 5.9 Generic_112234-03 i86pc i386 i86pc
$ cc -V
cc: Sun WorkShop 6 update 2 C 5.3 Patch 111680-09
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Theo Schlossnagle wrote:
The file that uses the spinlocks:
/src/backend/storage/lmgr/s_lock.c
can be compiled standalone with -DS_LOCK_TEST
To get the test to compile I had to link in tas.o as the attached patch
shows. Unfortunately this doesn't work for platforms
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Theo Schlossnagle wrote:
Kris Jurka wrote:
Anyway the test exits with
Stuck spinlock (80618e9) detected at ./s_lock.c:355.
on a linux gcc build this exits with
Stuck spinlock (0x5013ad) detected at ./s_lock.c:402.
This seems like a different problem, no? The patch I
