Re: [HACKERS] Support for detailed description of errors cased by trigger-violations

På lørdag 08. november 2014 kl. 23:39:50, skrev Tom Lane mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>>: Andreas Joseph Krogh writes: > Hi. �� When working with Oracle it is possible to catch constraint-violations > caused by triggers using JDBC, but it seems this isn't possible using PG, see > this thread: >

Re: [HACKERS] Support for detailed description of errors cased by trigger-violations

Andreas Joseph Krogh writes: > Hi.   When working with Oracle it is possible to catch constraint-violations > caused by triggers using JDBC, but it seems this isn't possible using PG, see > this thread: > https://github.com/impossibl/pgjdbc-ng/issues/111#issuecomment-62276464 I'm not exactly

[HACKERS] Support for detailed description of errors cased by trigger-violations

Hi.   When working with Oracle it is possible to catch constraint-violations caused by triggers using JDBC, but it seems this isn't possible using PG, see this thread: https://github.com/impossibl/pgjdbc-ng/issues/111#issuecomment-62276464   For check of FK-violations the protocol supports this