Re: [HACKERS] Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?

2005-04-27 Thread Neil Conway
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: What's the point of keeping such backend development discussion separate from the -hackers list? It's always been a mistake in the past... Yeah, it struck me as a bad idea as well. -Neil ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9:

Re: [HACKERS] Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?

2005-04-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > There is a fairly lengthy discussion going on right now on the bizgres > > mailing list about this topic, if your interested in helping out you > > might want to join that list. > > What's the point of keeping such backend development discussion separate > from

Re: [HACKERS] Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?

2005-04-27 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
There is a fairly lengthy discussion going on right now on the bizgres mailing list about this topic, if your interested in helping out you might want to join that list. What's the point of keeping such backend development discussion separate from the -hackers list? It's always been a mistake in

Re: [HACKERS] Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?

2005-04-27 Thread Hannu Krosing
On K, 2005-04-27 at 15:40 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > Hannu, > > > > There is a fairly lengthy discussion going on right now on the bizgres > > > mailing list about this topic, if your interested in helping out you > > > might want to join that list. > > > > Wow! there is a BizGres mailinglist !?

Re: [HACKERS] Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?

2005-04-27 Thread Josh Berkus
Hannu, > > There is a fairly lengthy discussion going on right now on the bizgres > > mailing list about this topic, if your interested in helping out you > > might want to join that list. > > Wow! there is a BizGres mailinglist !? > > And this is where the table-partitioning discussion is! > > Wh

Re: [HACKERS] Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?

2005-04-27 Thread Hannu Krosing
On T, 2005-04-26 at 16:52 -0400, Robert Treat wrote: > There is a fairly lengthy discussion going on right now on the bizgres > mailing list about this topic, if your interested in helping out you > might want to join that list. Wow! there is a BizGres mailinglist !? And this is where the table-

Re: [HACKERS] Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?

2005-04-27 Thread Robert Treat
There is a fairly lengthy discussion going on right now on the bizgres mailing list about this topic, if your interested in helping out you might want to join that list. Robert Treat On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 05:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ok! > The Links your posted are great and i guessing it w

Re: [HACKERS] Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?

2005-04-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok! The Links your posted are great and i guessing it will help me a lot! But the other Question (if Tablepartitioning under Developemt and will it be supported generally) is still alive. Josh Qingqing Zhou wrote: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes I have done the following Post to PSQL Performance, b

Re: [HACKERS] Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?

2005-04-26 Thread Qingqing Zhou
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > I have done the following Post to PSQL Performance, but Richard Huxton > say it > might be a better Idea to post it again on you List so i forward the > message. ... > It is exiting to see thadt Verison 8.0 has Tablespaces like ORACLE and > DB/2, > but i need Partition

[HACKERS] Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?

2005-04-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi PSQL Hackers, I have done the following Post to PSQL Performance, but Richard Huxton say it might be a better Idea to post it again on you List so i forward the message. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Ia a Guy from Germany an a strong Postgres believer! It is the best OpenSource Database i