On 9/1/15 12:13 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> ere is a series of patches to clean up the Unicode mapping script
> business in src/backend/utils/mb/Unicode/.
I never committed the last of these patches, which have the download
locations of the files. I have updated this a bit now and propose it
he
Hi,
On 2015-09-01 00:13:07 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Here is a series of patches to clean up the Unicode mapping script
> business in src/backend/utils/mb/Unicode/. It overlaps with the
> perlcritic work that I recently wrote about, except that these pieces
> are not strictly related to Pe
> What if we discovered that one of our mappings was wrong? Suppose
> that there is some encoding where the Unicode mapping for "a" is
> inadvertently mapped to the letter "b" in some other character set,
> and "b" is mapped to "a". I imagine that anyone using that encoding
> would want this fixe
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>> Then again, I don't have
>> any knowledge about how to handle such changes. But the fact that the
>> standards bodies are still making changes indicates that such changes
>> are to be expected and should be handled. I think this is similar
>> I think so. We must be very careful updating the maps. Adding new
>> mapping data would cause less problem, but replacing existing mappings
>> will be definitely a big problem for users.
>
> Note that I'm not actually proposing to change the mappings, I just want
> to get the scripts into worki
On 9/1/15 7:27 PM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> So apparently, the
>>> CJK to Unicode mappings are still evolving and should be updated
>>> occasionally. Next steps would be to commit some or all of these
>>> differences after additional ver
> I discovered that some of the source files that one is supposed to
> download don't exist anymore or are labeled obsolete. Also, running the
> scripts produces slight differences in the output. So apparently, the
> CJK to Unicode mappings are still evolving and should be updated
> occasionally.
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> So apparently, the
>> CJK to Unicode mappings are still evolving and should be updated
>> occasionally. Next steps would be to commit some or all of these
>> differences after additional verification, and then update the scripts
>> to
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> So apparently, the
> CJK to Unicode mappings are still evolving and should be updated
> occasionally. Next steps would be to commit some or all of these
> differences after additional verification, and then update the scripts
> to use wh
Here is a series of patches to clean up the Unicode mapping script
business in src/backend/utils/mb/Unicode/. It overlaps with the
perlcritic work that I recently wrote about, except that these pieces
are not strictly related to Perl, but wrong comments, missing makefile
pieces, and such.
I disco
10 matches
Mail list logo