There is absolutely 0 value in tackling that until someone can fix
hash's performance problems. If there is no real-world scenario for
using it ... which there really isn't ... then adding WAL support
still leaves you with no real-world scenario for using it.
This is not to suggest that I
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 07:18:17PM -0800, John Smith wrote:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-10/msg01468.php,
... I very much want to encourage authors of new Resource Managers and it
looks like we may be getting at least 3 new RMs that produce WAL
records: hash indexes
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-10/msg01468.php,
... I very much want to encourage authors of new Resource Managers and it
looks like we may be getting at least 3 new RMs that produce WAL
records: hash indexes (currently not WAL-logged), bitmap indexes and
clustered indexes for
John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can someone clarify if WAL-logging of hash indexes will be supported
in the 8.4 release?
There is absolutely 0 value in tackling that until someone can fix
hash's performance problems. If there is no real-world scenario for
using it ... which there really
