Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus writes:
>>> Barring objections I'm going to press ahead with completing and
>>> committing this; then in a separate patch remove VACUUM FULL INPLACE.
>
>> Was it our determination that we could remove VFI if we eliminated the
>> system catalogs? I'm fine with it, I
Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I thought the consensus was to remove it if possible. There may still
>> be some "marginal" use cases, but they don't justify the work that'd
>> be needed to make it play safely with HS; let alone fixing the other
>> longstanding gotchas with it, li
Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus writes:
> >> Barring objections I'm going to press ahead with completing and
> >> committing this; then in a separate patch remove VACUUM FULL INPLACE.
>
> > Was it our determination that we could remove VFI if we eliminated the
> > system catalogs? I'm fine with it
Josh Berkus writes:
>> Barring objections I'm going to press ahead with completing and
>> committing this; then in a separate patch remove VACUUM FULL INPLACE.
> Was it our determination that we could remove VFI if we eliminated the
> system catalogs? I'm fine with it, I just thought some people
> Barring objections I'm going to press ahead with completing and
> committing this; then in a separate patch remove VACUUM FULL INPLACE.
Was it our determination that we could remove VFI if we eliminated the
system catalogs? I'm fine with it, I just thought some people had a
marginal use case f
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Barring objections I'm going to press ahead with completing and
>> committing this; then in a separate patch remove VACUUM FULL INPLACE.
> With the second patch, we will continue to support reading
> XVAC_MOVED_OUT and IN hint bits, but never set them,
Tom Lane wrote:
> Barring objections I'm going to press ahead with completing and
> committing this; then in a separate patch remove VACUUM FULL INPLACE.
With the second patch, we will continue to support reading
XVAC_MOVED_OUT and IN hint bits, but never set them, correct?
--
Alvaro Herrera
Attached is the current state of my work on letting system catalogs
be processed by new-style VACUUM FULL (a/k/a CLUSTER). I haven't done
the WAL support nor worried about interlocking concurrent updates of
relation map files, but it passes the regression tests and can do
VACUUM FULL of every syst
