Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
OK, now, some of us will complain that Win32 is not needed at a time when the
Debian Synaptic graphical installer gives access to 13.748 packages. Win32
sounds like an "old Atari game station". Agreed. On the long-run, everyone
will leave Win32, even my grand-mother.
Wel
Le Mardi 18 Novembre 2003 20:22, ow a écrit :
> Not really. I simply think there are more pressing issues than win32 port.
Dear friends,
Porting to Win32 can multiply:
- direct users (i.e. developers) by a factor of two or three,
- indirect users by a larger factor, provided that major projects i
Claudio Natoli wrote:
just wondering if the guys involved in the Win32 port could give a quick
update?
I'm just (one of the many?) hanging out for this, to justify continued use
of Postgres to the powers that be. Seems like there has been no word on this
for a couple weeks, and I'm not even sure wh
On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 01:58, Claudio Natoli wrote:
> I'm just (one of the many?) hanging out for this, to justify continued use
> of Postgres to the powers that be. Seems like there has been no word on this
> for a couple weeks, and I'm not even sure whether or not it has made/will
> make it into 7
Hi all,
just wondering if the guys involved in the Win32 port could give a quick
update?
I'm just (one of the many?) hanging out for this, to justify continued use
of Postgres to the powers that be. Seems like there has been no word on this
for a couple weeks, and I'm not even sure whether or no
It is going to be non-threaded in 7.4. SRA may contribute their
threaded version to a future release of PostgreSQL, but I don't think it
will be 7.4. We are using PeerDirect's Win32 port, with a few
improvements from SRA's port (minus their thread changes). I am going
to work on it in March.
-
Has a final decision been made if the win32 port is going to
be threaded or not?
Merlin
Merlin Moncure wrote:
>
> Just a quick question... are you guys using the C runtime or the win32
> API to do things like file i/o and memory allocation. If you are using
> the win32 api, are you using asynchronous I/O? Generally, how much raw
> win32 code do you expect to write (assumption: as l
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Kings-Lynne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 01 February 2003 12:40
> To: Greg Copeland
> Cc: Dave Page; PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List; Tom Lane
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port powerfail testing
>
>
> Tr
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 11:30:17AM -0600, Greg Copeland wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 00:34, Adam Haberlach wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 12:27:31AM -0600, Greg Copeland wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 14:36, Dave Page wrote:
> > > Please go with XFS or ext3. There are a number of blesse
On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 00:34, Adam Haberlach wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 12:27:31AM -0600, Greg Copeland wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 14:36, Dave Page wrote:
> > >
> > > I intend to run the tests on a Dual PIII 1GHz box, with 1Gb of Non-ECC
> > > RAM and a 20Gb (iirc) IDE disk. I will run
Try it with FreeBSD's UFS and FreeBSD 5.0's new UFS2 filesystems perhaps -
or I could!
Chris
On 1 Feb 2003, Greg Copeland wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 14:36, Dave Page wrote:
> >
> > I intend to run the tests on a Dual PIII 1GHz box, with 1Gb of Non-ECC
> > RAM and a 20Gb (iirc) IDE disk. I wi
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 12:27:31AM -0600, Greg Copeland wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 14:36, Dave Page wrote:
> >
> > I intend to run the tests on a Dual PIII 1GHz box, with 1Gb of Non-ECC
> > RAM and a 20Gb (iirc) IDE disk. I will run on Windows 2000 Server with
> > an NTFS filesystem, and again
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 14:36, Dave Page wrote:
>
> I intend to run the tests on a Dual PIII 1GHz box, with 1Gb of Non-ECC
> RAM and a 20Gb (iirc) IDE disk. I will run on Windows 2000 Server with
> an NTFS filesystem, and again on Slackware Linux 8 with either ext3 or
> reiserfs (which is preferred?
Dave Page kirjutas R, 31.01.2003 kell 22:36:
> Despite some people's thoughts that a powerfail test is of little use, I
> going to spend some time doing one anyway because I think Tom's
> arguments for it are valid. I have lashed together the attached test
> program (the important bits are the setu
Just a quick question... are you guys using the C runtime or the win32
API to do things like file i/o and memory allocation. If you are using
the win32 api, are you using asynchronous I/O? Generally, how much raw
win32 code do you expect to write (assumption: as little as possible).
As for memor
Despite some people's thoughts that a powerfail test is of little use, I
going to spend some time doing one anyway because I think Tom's
arguments for it are valid. I have lashed together the attached test
program (the important bits are the setup, run and check functions) for
review before I actu
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Wieck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:47 AM
> To: Peter Eisentraut
> Cc: Justin Clift; Hannu Krosing; Bruce Momjian; Tom Lane;
> Postgres development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port patches su
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Justin Clift writes:
>
> > The advantages to having the Win32 port be natively compatible with
> > Visual Studio is that it already is (no toolset-porting work needed
> > there),
>
> You're missing a couple of points here. First, the MS Visual whatever
> compiler can
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 11:49, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 15:34, Curtis Faith wrote:
> > tom lane writes:
> > > You think we should drive away our existing unix developers
> > > in the mere hope of attracting windows developers? Sorry, it
> > > isn't going to happen.
> >
> >
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Justin Clift writes:
The advantages to having the Win32 port be natively compatible with
Visual Studio is that it already is (no toolset-porting work needed
there),
You're missing a couple of points here. First, the MS Visual whatever
compiler can also be used with a m
Justin Clift writes:
> The advantages to having the Win32 port be natively compatible with
> Visual Studio is that it already is (no toolset-porting work needed
> there),
You're missing a couple of points here. First, the MS Visual whatever
compiler can also be used with a makefile-driven build
Bruce Momjian writes:
> I do have a problem with MKS toolkit, which is a commerical purchase.
> I would like to avoid reliance on that, though Jan said he needed their
> bash.
I don't believe that quite yet. Jan said the regression test script
crashes Cygwin's bash, but how come it has never cra
Justin Clift wrote:
Since March 2002 (less than 1 year ago), it's
been downloaded about 120,000,000 times. Wow. 120 Million downloads in
less than 1 year. That's a pretty popular IDE (16th most popular
project on SourceForge)
Arrrgh. Thought that sounded a bit too high.
Wrong column, i
Hannu Krosing wrote:
Bruce Momjian kirjutas P, 26.01.2003 kell 05:07:
Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I don't see a strong reason not
to stick with good old configure; make; make install. You're already
requiring various Unix-like tools, so you might as well req
Bruce Momjian kirjutas P, 26.01.2003 kell 05:07:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I don't see a strong reason not
> > > to stick with good old configure; make; make install. You're already
> > > requiring various Unix-like tools, so you might as well require
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I don't see a strong reason not
> > to stick with good old configure; make; make install. You're already
> > requiring various Unix-like tools, so you might as well require the full
> > shell environment.
>
> Indeed. I think the
Curtis Faith wrote:
> tom lane writes:
> > You think we should drive away our existing unix developers
> > in the mere hope of attracting windows developers? Sorry, it
> > isn't going to happen.
>
> Tom brings up a good point, that changes to support Windows should not
> add to the tasks of tho
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 20:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Firebird uses a set of Borland command line tools and Borland's make,
> which they give away as a free download. Even if you're compiling for
> Windows, the build process uses Borland's command line "make". A batch
> build script copi
Viacheslav N Tararin wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Exists in CVS Win32 port sources?
Not yet.
I sent patches for a native Win32 port of v7.2.1 out a few days ago.
It's sure a couple weeks away before something against current CVS HEAD
comes out of that.
You can find the patches at
http://www.janwieck.ne
Firebird uses a set of Borland command line tools and Borland's make,
which they give away as a free download. Even if you're compiling for
Windows, the build process uses Borland's command line "make". A batch
build script copies makefiles from a single source directory and spreads
them aro
Jan Wieck writes:
> We focused on porting the programs. The goal was to have PostgreSQL
> running native on Win32 for a user. Having a nice and easy maintainable
> cross platform config, build and test environment for the developers is
> definitely something that still needs to be done (hint, hint
Hi.
Exists in CVS Win32 port sources?
Thanks.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list clea
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 02:01, Dann Corbit wrote:
> Maybe because most of the machines in the world (by a titanic landslide)
> are Windoze boxes.
On the desktop, yes. On the server, no. PostgreSQL is nore intended for a
server, no? I can see the utility in having a development installatio
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 15:34, Curtis Faith wrote:
> tom lane writes:
> > You think we should drive away our existing unix developers
> > in the mere hope of attracting windows developers? Sorry, it
> > isn't going to happen.
>
> Tom brings up a good point, that changes to support Windows should
tom lane writes:
> You think we should drive away our existing unix developers
> in the mere hope of attracting windows developers? Sorry, it
> isn't going to happen.
Tom brings up a good point, that changes to support Windows should not
add to the tasks of those who are doing the bulk of the w
> -Original Message-
> From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:54 PM
> To: Brian Bruns; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port patches submitted
>
>
> Brian Bruns wrote:
>
> >P
Brian Bruns wrote:
Problem is, nobody builds packages on windows anyway. They just all
download the binary a guy (usually literally "one guy") built. So, let's
just make sure that one guy has cygwin loaded on his machine and we'll be
all set.
Correct.
I wonder why we need a Windows port
sentraut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jan Wieck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Postgres development" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 5:40 PM
> Subject: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port patches submitted
>
>
> > Jan Wieck wr
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> "Al Sutton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I would back keeping the windows specific files, and if anything moving the
> > code away from using the UNIX like programs. My reasoning is that the more
> > unix tools you use for compiling, the less likley you are to attract
> > e
"Al Sutton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would back keeping the windows specific files, and if anything moving the
> code away from using the UNIX like programs. My reasoning is that the more
> unix tools you use for compiling, the less likley you are to attract
> existing windows-only develope
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Al Sutton wrote:
> I would back keeping the windows specific files, and if anything moving the
> code away from using the UNIX like programs. My reasoning is that the more
> unix tools you use for compiling, the less likley you are to attract
> existing windows-only develope
gres development" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 5:40 PM
Subject: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port patches submitted
> Jan Wieck writes:
>
> > I just submitted the patches for the native Win32 port of v7.2.1 on the
> > patches mailing list.
>
&
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I don't see a strong reason not
> > to stick with good old configure; make; make install. You're already
> > requiring various Unix-like tools, so you might as well require the full
> > shell environment.
>
> Indeed. I think t
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't see a strong reason not
> to stick with good old configure; make; make install. You're already
> requiring various Unix-like tools, so you might as well require the full
> shell environment.
Indeed. I think the goal here is to have a port th
Jan Wieck writes:
> I just submitted the patches for the native Win32 port of v7.2.1 on the
> patches mailing list.
I'm concerned that you are adding all these *.dsp files for build process
control. This is going to be a burden to maintain. Everytime someone
changes an aspect of how a file is b
Hi,
I just submitted the patches for the native Win32 port of v7.2.1 on the
patches mailing list.
If you are not subscribed to the patches list you can download them from
http://www.janwieck.net/win32_port
Jan
--
#==#
# It's
Jochem van Dieten wrote:
everything. Even when connecting to a 7.3 server the problems (no schema
support etc.) are far outweighted by the advantages of having a
lightweight (just libpq.dll + psql.exe, no cygwin, no installation)
client tool. But it would be nice if schema support etc. was avai
Jan Wieck wrote:
As a PostgreSQL coreteam member I want to thank my employer, the
PeerDirect Corporation, for contributing this work, which IMHO is an
important step for PostgreSQL.
Yes, a very important step. A big thank you to PeerDirect.
What we need from here are some ideas how this port
My idea was to go through the patch and break it out into the items it
addresses:
fork/exec
loop rename test
handle \r in COPY
copydir for cp -r
backslash tests
rmdir not recursive for rm -r
shared memory could map to new address in
Okay,
I have finally extracted out a patch that applied to a 7.2.1 tree get's
me something that compiles and passes all regression tests on RedHat
Linux and Windows 2000.
To clearify upfront, even if the build process of this port uses a few
cygwin tools, the final executables and libraries do no
Jan is working on the port and should be posting it to the patches list
in the next few days. After that, we will all look over the patch, port
it from 7.2.1 to CVS HEAD, and make improvements before applying to CVS
HEAD.
Stay subscribed to hackers and you will see all the activity as soon as
it
Hi.
Where I can download sources of win32 port?
Can I help for win32 port?
Thanks.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can
Bruce Momjian writes:
> OK, Steve's vote is enough to indicate that most want [something]
Amazing. How can others hope to achieve such powers?
;-)
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscrib
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us]
> Sent: 08 November 2002 16:10
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Steve Howe; Katie Ward; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port
>
> I hope I didn't sound too unappreciative
Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us]
> > Sent: 08 November 2002 04:54
> > To: Steve Howe
> > Cc: Katie Ward; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port
> >
>
TECTED]
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@;postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Steve Howe
> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 12:43 AM
> To: Katie Ward
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port
>
>
> Hello Katie,
>
> Thursday, November 7, 2002, 7:08:20 PM, you wrot
Hi, all.
I just wanted to give you an update on where my company (PeerDirect) is with
regards to our native Windows port.
We are planning on contributing the code for the native port sometime next
month (in December). We would have liked to contribute it earlier, but our
work schedules here didn
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us]
> Sent: 08 November 2002 04:54
> To: Steve Howe
> Cc: Katie Ward; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port
>
>
>
> OK, Steve's vote is enough to ind
OK, Steve's vote is enough to indicate that most want to wait for
PeerDirect's version before moving forward with the Win32 port.
This also confirms that this will _not_ be an abreviated release cycle
but a full 4-6 months of development, followed by 2 months of beta.
--
Hello Katie,
Thursday, November 7, 2002, 7:08:20 PM, you wrote:
KW> Hi, all.
KW> I just wanted to give you an update on where my company (PeerDirect) is with
KW> regards to our native Windows port.
KW> We are planning on contributing the code for the native port sometime next
KW> month (in Dece
Hi, all.
I just wanted to give you an update on where my company (PeerDirect) is with
regards to our native Windows port.
We are planning on contributing the code for the native port sometime next
month (in December). We would have liked to contribute it earlier, but our
work schedules here didn
Hello Bruce,
Thursday, November 7, 2002, 12:56:57 AM, you wrote:
BM> I have thrown out the idea and some felt that if we could get PITR and
BM> Win32, that would be enough for a release, even if we could get it done
BM> in a month or two.
BM> However, I see your point that releasing too often ca
Justin Clift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Whilst having a regular 4-6 month cycle (er... when was the last time
> THAT happened?) is alright, we should get the *Windows* native version
> out to the world ASAP.
We don't have a Windows native version, and it sounds like it'll be
awhile before we ha
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> What do others want, a regular 4-6 month cycle or a shorter one?
Whilst having a regular 4-6 month cycle (er... when was the last time
THAT happened?) is alright, we should get the *Windows* native version
out to the world ASAP. This (and secondly PITR) will greatly enh
Neil Conway wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have talked to Jan, and PeerDirect wants to submit a complete working
> > Win32 patch, rather than the piece-by-piece merged patch I was working
> > on.
>
> Is there a reason you're doing the actual merging with CVS? ISTM it
> mi
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have talked to Jan, and PeerDirect wants to submit a complete working
> Win32 patch, rather than the piece-by-piece merged patch I was working
> on.
Is there a reason you're doing the actual merging with CVS? ISTM it
might be more straight-forward to j
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 08:20:16PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Let me map out the calendar. I think we are very close on the
> > point-in-time recovery patch. I am hoping to get that in during
> > November, and I _was_ hoping for the Win32 port too, so we could have
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 08:20:16PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Let me map out the calendar. I think we are very close on the
> point-in-time recovery patch. I am hoping to get that in during
> November, and I _was_ hoping for the Win32 port too, so we could have
> another two months of develop
pgman wrote:
> I have copies of Peer Direct's (Jan's company) port of PostgreSQL to
> Win32, and SRA's port to Win32, and permission to generate a merged
> patch that can be applied to 7.4.
>
> Now that 7.3 is almost complete, I am going to start work on that. I
> will post patches that deal with
Hello Bruce,
Wednesday, November 6, 2002, 8:33:32 PM, you wrote:
BM> Steve Howe wrote:
>> Hello Bruce,
>>
>> Wednesday, November 6, 2002, 3:19:35 AM, you wrote:
>>
>> BM> I have copies of Peer Direct's (Jan's company) port of PostgreSQL to
>> BM> Win32, and SRA's port to Win32, and permission t
Steve Howe wrote:
> Hello Bruce,
>
> Wednesday, November 6, 2002, 3:19:35 AM, you wrote:
>
> BM> I have copies of Peer Direct's (Jan's company) port of PostgreSQL to
> BM> Win32, and SRA's port to Win32, and permission to generate a merged
> BM> patch that can be applied to 7.4.
>
> BM> Now that
Hello Bruce,
Wednesday, November 6, 2002, 3:19:35 AM, you wrote:
BM> I have copies of Peer Direct's (Jan's company) port of PostgreSQL to
BM> Win32, and SRA's port to Win32, and permission to generate a merged
BM> patch that can be applied to 7.4.
BM> Now that 7.3 is almost complete, I am going
Jan Wieck wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > Jan Wieck writes:
> > >
> > > > To Hannu: the Windows port we did here depends on MS VC++ features like
> > > > the ability to specify in the project to substitute header files. I
> > > > don't know much about MingW and
Jan Wieck wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Here is a list of patch areas that I will address with the Win32 port:
> >
> > fork/exec
> > loop rename test
> > handle \r in COPY
> > copydir for cp -r
> > backslash tests
> > rmdir not recursive for
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Here is a list of patch areas that I will address with the Win32 port:
>
> fork/exec
> loop rename test
> handle \r in COPY
> copydir for cp -r
> backslash tests
> rmdir not recursive for rm -r
> shared memory could
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Jan Wieck writes:
> >
> > > To Hannu: the Windows port we did here depends on MS VC++ features like
> > > the ability to specify in the project to substitute header files. I
> > > don't know much about MingW and if you can do things like that wi
Here is a list of patch areas that I will address with the Win32 port:
fork/exec
loop rename test
handle \r in COPY
copydir for cp -r
backslash tests
rmdir not recursive for rm -r
shared memory could map to new address in exec child
c
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Jan Wieck writes:
>
> > To Hannu: the Windows port we did here depends on MS VC++ features like
> > the ability to specify in the project to substitute header files. I
> > don't know much about MingW and if you can do things like that with it.
>
> Before long someone wil
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Conway [mailto:mail@;joeconway.com]
> Sent: 06 November 2002 16:16
> To: Bruce Momjian
> Cc: Jan Wieck; Hannu Krosing; PostgreSQL-development; Tatsuo Ishii
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port
>
>
>
> Bruce, I can com
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Jan Wieck writes:
>
> > To Hannu: the Windows port we did here depends on MS VC++ features like
> > the ability to specify in the project to substitute header files. I
> > don't know much about MingW and if you can do things like that with it.
>
> Before long someone
Jan Wieck writes:
> To Hannu: the Windows port we did here depends on MS VC++ features like
> the ability to specify in the project to substitute header files. I
> don't know much about MingW and if you can do things like that with it.
Before long someone will port the Windows port to MinGW, so w
Joe Conway wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Jan Wieck wrote:
> >
> >>>Actually, I will be doing all the coding on BSD/OS. I am more merging
> >>>patches than actual coding, though. This will guarantee that the
> >>>patches will not affect the Unix platforms. I will need help from
> >>>others t
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Jan Wieck wrote:
Actually, I will be doing all the coding on BSD/OS. I am more merging
patches than actual coding, though. This will guarantee that the
patches will not affect the Unix platforms. I will need help from
others to check the various Win32 compilers.
I was w
Jan Wieck wrote:
> > Actually, I will be doing all the coding on BSD/OS. I am more merging
> > patches than actual coding, though. This will guarantee that the
> > patches will not affect the Unix platforms. I will need help from
> > others to check the various Win32 compilers.
>
> I was wonder
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Hannu Krosing wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian kirjutas K, 06.11.2002 kell 08:19:
> > > I have copies of Peer Direct's (Jan's company) port of PostgreSQL to
> > > Win32, and SRA's port to Win32, and permission to generate a merged
> > > patch that can be applied to 7.4.
> >
> > Gr
Hannu Krosing wrote:
> Bruce Momjian kirjutas K, 06.11.2002 kell 08:19:
> > I have copies of Peer Direct's (Jan's company) port of PostgreSQL to
> > Win32, and SRA's port to Win32, and permission to generate a merged
> > patch that can be applied to 7.4.
>
> Great!
>
> > Now that 7.3 is almost c
Bruce Momjian kirjutas K, 06.11.2002 kell 08:19:
> I have copies of Peer Direct's (Jan's company) port of PostgreSQL to
> Win32, and SRA's port to Win32, and permission to generate a merged
> patch that can be applied to 7.4.
Great!
> Now that 7.3 is almost complete, I am going to start work on
On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 01:32, Justin Clift wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > I have copies of Peer Direct's (Jan's company) port of PostgreSQL to
> > Win32, and SRA's port to Win32, and permission to generate a merged
> > patch that can be applied to 7.4.
> >
> > Now that 7.3 is almost complet
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> I have copies of Peer Direct's (Jan's company) port of PostgreSQL to
> Win32, and SRA's port to Win32, and permission to generate a merged
> patch that can be applied to 7.4.
>
> Now that 7.3 is almost complete, I am going to start work on that. I
> will post patches tha
I have copies of Peer Direct's (Jan's company) port of PostgreSQL to
Win32, and SRA's port to Win32, and permission to generate a merged
patch that can be applied to 7.4.
Now that 7.3 is almost complete, I am going to start work on that. I
will post patches that deal with specific portability iss
I have added the recent threads discussing a Win32 port to CVS
TODO.detail, and have added an item on the TODO list:
* Create native Win32 port [win32]
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your l
93 matches
Mail list logo
