Re: [HACKERS] Win32 sysconfig - pg_service.conf

2006-04-21 Thread Bruce Momjian
Andrew Dunstan wrote: David Fetter wrote: doesn't report anything by way of --sysconfdir, which in turn means that people have to do some fragile hackery in order even to see a pg_service.conf file. Can we put such a configuration directive into the binary builds? Is this known to

[HACKERS] Win32 sysconfig - pg_service.conf

2006-03-29 Thread David Fetter
Folks, I'm trying to get pg_service.conf working on Windows so we can standardize on a way of doing things cross-platform, and noticed that pg_config.exe --configure doesn't report anything by way of --sysconfdir, which in turn means that people have to do some fragile hackery in order even to

Re: [HACKERS] Win32 sysconfig - pg_service.conf

2006-03-29 Thread Andrew Dunstan
David Fetter wrote: Folks, I'm trying to get pg_service.conf working on Windows so we can standardize on a way of doing things cross-platform, and noticed that pg_config.exe --configure why are you using this flag? if you leave it off you will see everything. doesn't report anything

Re: [HACKERS] Win32 sysconfig - pg_service.conf

2006-03-29 Thread David Fetter
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 03:53:13PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: David Fetter wrote: Folks, I'm trying to get pg_service.conf working on Windows so we can standardize on a way of doing things cross-platform, and noticed that pg_config.exe --configure why are you using this flag? if you

Re: [HACKERS] Win32 sysconfig - pg_service.conf

2006-03-29 Thread Andrew Dunstan
David Fetter wrote: doesn't report anything by way of --sysconfdir, which in turn means that people have to do some fragile hackery in order even to see a pg_service.conf file. Can we put such a configuration directive into the binary builds? Is this known to work? In any case, the