I have spare licences for most versions of Windows as well, so if
Microsoft's virtual server product is not too expensive for us I
can probably add a few platform variations to that box. I'll look
into it.
In fact MS released Virtual PC 2004 for free a couple days ago
On Jul 16, 2006, at 3:08 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Kris Jurka wrote:
For my cygwin buildfarm member I setup cron, but the make step
failed for every build for unknown reasons while succeeding if not
run from cron.
Is this still happening? We should try to get to the bottom of it.
Try
-Original Message-
From: Petr Jelinek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 July 2006 18:05
To: Dave Page
Cc: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
Dave Page wrote:
I have spare licences for most versions of Windows as well,
so if
Dave Page wrote:
It seems that VMWare are following suit - their entry level VMWare
Server is now free for Windows and Linux :-)
http://www.vmware.com/products/server/
It has been for some time, at least in Beta, so I'm not sure who really
went first.
We should be supplying a
What's wrong with this picture?
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_status.pl
Notice how all the red is at the bottom of the report? That's because
all the Windows machines are at the bottom, indicating that they haven't
reported recently. AFAICT, snake is the only Windows machine that
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
[windows buildfarm machines run irregularly]
For my part the difficulty is scheduling. As a primarily unix user I
understand cron, but have no idea what the windows equivalent is. For my
cygwin buildfarm member I setup cron, but the make step failed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Tom Lane
Sent: Sun 7/16/2006 3:29 PM
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
AFAICT, snake is the only Windows machine that
actually runs the buildfarm on a regular schedule
-Original Message-
From: Kris Jurka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 7/16/2006 3:44 PM
To: Tom Lane
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org; Dave Page
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
For my part the difficulty is scheduling. As a primarily unix user I
Kris Jurka wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
[windows buildfarm machines run irregularly]
For my part the difficulty is scheduling. As a primarily unix user I
understand cron, but have no idea what the windows equivalent is. For
my cygwin buildfarm member I setup cron, but
Dave Page wrote:
I have spare licences for most versions of Windows as well, so if Microsoft's
virtual server product is not too expensive for us I can probably add a few
platform variations to that box. I'll look into it.
In fact MS released Virtual PC 2004 for free a couple days ago
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Tom Lane
Sent: Sun 7/16/2006 3:29 PM
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
AFAICT, snake is the only Windows machine that
actually runs the buildfarm
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave Page wrote:
I can bump that up as high as you'd like within reason. 4? 6 times a day?
Let's go for 6, at least for HEAD.
There's probably no need to check the back branches oftener than once a
day, but if you can do HEAD every 4 hours that'd be
-Original Message-
From: Petr Jelinek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dave Page dpage@vale-housing.co.uk
Cc: PostgreSQL-development pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Sent: 16/07/06 18:05
Subject: Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
In fact MS released Virtual PC 2004 for free a couple days
Andrew, Tom:
I'm putting a solicitation in this week's PWN for more Windows buildfarm
members. With 250,000 Windows+PostgreSQL users out there, you'd think a few
people would step up.
Dave, I think you may need to give Andrew Windows buildfarm instructions to
put up at www.pgbuildfarm.org.
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave Page wrote:
I can bump that up as high as you'd like within reason. 4? 6 times a day?
Let's go for 6, at least for HEAD.
There's probably no need to check the back branches oftener than once a
day, but if you can do HEAD every
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 July 2006 18:47
To: Andrew Dunstan
Cc: Dave Page; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave Page wrote:
I
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 July 2006 18:17
To: Dave Page
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
care to share that script ? I set up seahorse on friday but as a
unix-sysadmin I have not yet managed
-Original Message-
From: Josh Berkus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 July 2006 19:04
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: Tom Lane; Andrew Dunstan; Dave Page
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
Andrew, Tom:
I'm putting a solicitation
Dave Page dpage@vale-housing.co.uk writes:
In fact MS released Virtual PC 2004 for free a couple days ago
(http://www.microsoft.com/windows/virtualpc/default.mspx)
Yeah - I have licences for it, but it's more of an interactive emulator. I
think I'll need the server version to run fully
Kris Jurka wrote:
For my cygwin buildfarm member I setup cron, but the make step
failed for every build for unknown reasons while succeeding if not run
from cron.
Is this still happening? We should try to get to the bottom of it.
cheers
andrew
---(end of
On 7/16/06, Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kris Jurka wrote: On Sun, 16 Jul 2006, Tom Lane wrote: [windows buildfarm machines run irregularly] For my part the difficulty is scheduling.As a primarily unix user I
understand cron, but have no idea what the windows equivalent is.For my
21 matches
Mail list logo