On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:02 AM, David G Johnston
wrote:
> rohtodeveloper wrote
>> So how to deal with this kind of situation if I want a implicit
>> conversion?
>
> As of the out-of-support 8.3 release many of the implicit casts previously
> defined have been changed to explicit casts. It is a
rohtodeveloper wrote
> So how to deal with this kind of situation if I want a implicit
> conversion?
As of the out-of-support 8.3 release many of the implicit casts previously
defined have been changed to explicit casts. It is a catalog change -
obviously, since you can still define implicit cast
Dear All,
L've got a question for you.
If the value of the integer type is converted to a value of type
Boolean，PostgreSQL will display just like"The rule has already exist";
1. CREATE CAST (integer AS bool) WITH INOUT AS IMPLICIT;
ERROR: cast from type integer to typ
