On 23/03/16 01:56, Amit Langote wrote:
On 2016/03/23 9:19, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa wrote:
- Regarding GSoC: it looks to me that we failed to submit in time. Is this
what happened, or we weren't selected? If the former (and no criticism
here, just realizing a fact) what can we do next year to
On 2016/03/23 9:19, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa wrote:
> - Regarding GSoC: it looks to me that we failed to submit in time. Is this
> what happened, or we weren't selected? If the former (and no criticism
> here, just realizing a fact) what can we do next year to avoid this
> happening again? Is
On 22/02/16 23:23, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa wrote:
On 22/02/16 05:10, Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas writes:
On 19/02/16 10:10, �lvaro Hernández Tortosa wrote:
Oleg and I discussed recently that a really good addition to a GSoC
item would be to study whether it's
On 22/02/16 23:34, Tom Lane wrote:
=?UTF-8?Q?=c3=81lvaro_Hern=c3=a1ndez_Tortosa?= writes:
On 22/02/16 05:10, Tom Lane wrote:
Another variable is that your answers might depend on what format you
assume the client is trying to convert from/to. (It's presumably not
text
=?UTF-8?Q?=c3=81lvaro_Hern=c3=a1ndez_Tortosa?= writes:
> On 22/02/16 05:10, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Another variable is that your answers might depend on what format you
>> assume the client is trying to convert from/to. (It's presumably not
>> text JSON, but then what is it?)
>
On 22/02/16 05:10, Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas writes:
On 19/02/16 10:10, �lvaro Hernández Tortosa wrote:
Oleg and I discussed recently that a really good addition to a GSoC
item would be to study whether it's convenient to have a binary
serialization format for
On 21/02/16 21:15, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 19/02/16 10:10, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa wrote:
Oleg and I discussed recently that a really good addition to a
GSoC
item would be to study whether it's convenient to have a binary
serialization format for jsonb over the wire. Some argue
On 02/21/16 23:10, Tom Lane wrote:
> Another variable is that your answers might depend on what format you
> assume the client is trying to convert from/to. (It's presumably not
> text JSON, but then what is it?)
This connects tangentially to a question I've been meaning to ask
for a while,
Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> On 19/02/16 10:10, Ãlvaro Hernández Tortosa wrote:
>> Oleg and I discussed recently that a really good addition to a GSoC
>> item would be to study whether it's convenient to have a binary
>> serialization format for jsonb over the wire.
> Seems a
On 19/02/16 10:10, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa wrote:
Oleg and I discussed recently that a really good addition to a GSoC
item would be to study whether it's convenient to have a binary
serialization format for jsonb over the wire. Some argue this should be
benchmarked first. So the scope for
On 02/19/2016 10:10 AM, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa wrote:
Hi.
Oleg and I discussed recently that a really good addition to a GSoC
item would be to study whether it's convenient to have a binary
serialization format for jsonb over the wire. Some argue this should be
benchmarked first.
Hi.
Oleg and I discussed recently that a really good addition to a GSoC
item would be to study whether it's convenient to have a binary
serialization format for jsonb over the wire. Some argue this should be
benchmarked first. So the scope for this project would be to benchmark
and
Atri Sharma wrote:
> I agree, there might be scope for non core projects and PL/Java sounds like
> a good area.
We've hosted MADlib-based projects in the past, so why not.
--
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training &
On 19 Feb 2016 8:30 am, "Chapman Flack" wrote:
>
> On 02/18/16 19:35, Amit Langote wrote:
>
> > Apparently, the deadline is: February 20, 2016 at 04:00 (+0900 UTC)
> >
> > https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/
>
> For anybody finding that web site as anti-navigable as I did,
On 02/18/16 19:35, Amit Langote wrote:
> Apparently, the deadline is: February 20, 2016 at 04:00 (+0900 UTC)
>
> https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/
For anybody finding that web site as anti-navigable as I did, here
are more direct links to the actual rules, and terms of agreement
for the
On 2016/02/18 22:44, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
>> I didn't find for 2016 but here is the PostgreSQL wiki page for the last
>> year's GSoC page: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/GSoC_2015#Project_Ideas
>
>
> I've created wiki page for GSoC
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Amit Langote <
langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On 2016/02/17 16:27, Shubham Barai wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I am currently pursuing my bachelor of engineering in computer science
> > at Maharashtra
> > Institute of Technology, Pune ,India. I am
Hi Shubham,
On 2016/02/17 16:27, Shubham Barai wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am currently pursuing my bachelor of engineering in computer science
> at Maharashtra
> Institute of Technology, Pune ,India. I am very excited about contributing
> to postgres through google summer of code program.
>
Hello everyone,
I am currently pursuing my bachelor of engineering in computer science
at Maharashtra
Institute of Technology, Pune ,India. I am very excited about contributing
to postgres through google summer of code program.
Is postgres applying for gsoc 2016 as mentoring organization ?
19 matches
Mail list logo