On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> On 11/5/16 8:03 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Peter Eisentraut
>> wrote:
>>> > On 11/3/16 7:17 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> This patch not being complicated, so I would vote for those being
>> ad
On 11/5/16 8:03 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Peter Eisentraut
> wrote:
>> > On 11/3/16 7:17 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> >> This patch not being complicated, so I would vote for those being
>>> >> addressed now so as they are not forgotten even if there is a FIXME
On 11/5/16 8:03 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> > Yeah that was wrong anyway. The previously existing translation markers
>> > were wrong. We want to translate the fmt, not the formatted message.
> Does using one way or the other actually change something? Because
> pg_rewind/logging.c is not marki
On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> On 11/3/16 7:17 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> This patch not being complicated, so I would vote for those being
>> addressed now so as they are not forgotten even if there is a FIXME
>> flag added. Perhaps you don't think so, and as that's
On 11/3/16 7:17 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> This patch not being complicated, so I would vote for those being
> addressed now so as they are not forgotten even if there is a FIXME
> flag added. Perhaps you don't think so, and as that's a minor issue
> I'll be fine with your judgement as well.
OK,
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 1:44 AM, Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> On 10/31/16 1:58 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> In info.c, missing some entries in report_unmatched_relation() when
>> reporting unmatching relations?
>
> Yeah, that will need a bit of a rewrite, so FIXME later?
This patch not being complic
On 10/31/16 1:58 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> 2) For 0002 and pg_test_fsync, I am seeing a missing entry:
> printf(NA_FORMAT, "n/a*\n");
ok
> 4) 0004 and pg_upgrade... In check.c, three places like that:
> if (!db_used)
> {
> fprintf(script, "Databa
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> Here is a series of patches to add NLS to the remaining bin programs,
> which were moved from contrib a while ago. (If you're missing pgbench,
> I'm skipping that for now because it's more complicated.) I'll add this
> to the commit fes
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> On 10/26/16 9:18 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Side question just for curiosity: when is AVAIL_LANGUAGES filled? Once
>> the translations are added to the tree?
>
> Yes, that happens when the translations are copied in before a release.
>
On 10/26/16 9:18 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Side question just for curiosity: when is AVAIL_LANGUAGES filled? Once
> the translations are added to the tree?
Yes, that happens when the translations are copied in before a release.
See here for the script that is normally used:
https://git.postgre
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> Here is a series of patches to add NLS to the remaining bin programs,
> which were moved from contrib a while ago. (If you're missing pgbench,
> I'm skipping that for now because it's more complicated.) I'll add this
> to the commit fes
Here is a series of patches to add NLS to the remaining bin programs,
which were moved from contrib a while ago. (If you're missing pgbench,
I'm skipping that for now because it's more complicated.) I'll add this
to the commit fest.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
P
12 matches
Mail list logo
