Ross J. Reedstrom writes:
> Hmm, multiple processors, and lots of IPC:
> [snip]
> Since it's just you and the sysadmin: any chance you could bring
> the system up uniprocessor (I don't even know if this is _possible_
> with Sun hardware, let alone how hard) and run the regressions some
> mor
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 10:13:29PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Frank Joerdens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I just did that and ran make check 4 times. 3 times went completely
> > smoothly, once I had random fail. This is the same behaviour that I saw
> > when running make installcheck (76 successf
Ross J. Reedstrom writes:
> Hmm, multiple processors, and lots of IPC: I've got a bad feeling
> about this.
Although I'm not absolutely certain, the systems on which I had this
problem were not multi-processor, they were just plain-old workstations in
a university computer lab. At the time (7.0
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 11:15:45AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Frank Joerdens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Now I get:
>
> > select_distinct_on ... FAILED
> > select_implicit ... FAILED
> > random ... failed (ignored)
> > portals ... FAILED
> >
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 05:03:13PM +0100, Frank Joerdens wrote:
>
> There is no load at all on this server at the moment. The sysadmin and
> myself are currently the only people accessing a brand new UltraSPARC with 3
> CPUs and 3/4 GB of RAM to install stuff.
Hmm, multiple processors, and lots
Frank Joerdens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now I get:
> select_distinct_on ... FAILED
> select_implicit ... FAILED
> random ... failed (ignored)
> portals ... FAILED
> test misc ... FAILED
Reporting a regression failure this
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 03:29:59PM +, Patrick Welche wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 10:13:29PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Frank Joerdens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I just did that and ran make check 4 times. 3 times went completely
> > > smoothly, once I had random fail. This is the s
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> Frank Joerdens writes:
>
> > > I have experienced before that Unix sockets will cause random
> > > connection abortions on Solaris [ . . . ]
> >
> > Isn't that _really_ bad? Random connection abortions when going
> > over Unix sockets?? My app does _all_ the conn
Frank Joerdens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just did that and ran make check 4 times. 3 times went completely
> smoothly, once I had random fail. This is the same behaviour that I saw
> when running make installcheck (76 successful most of the time,
> sometimes you get 75 out of 76 with random
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 09:47:16PM +0100, Frank Joerdens wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 12:04:40PM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> [ . . . ]
> > > for the /tmp directory, which looks distinctly odd to me. What kind of
> > > device is swap (I know what swap is normally but I didn't know you coul
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 12:04:40PM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
[ . . . ]
> > for the /tmp directory, which looks distinctly odd to me. What kind of
> > device is swap (I know what swap is normally but I didn't know you could
> > mount stuff there . . . )??
>
> That is a tmpfs file system which
Frank Joerdens writes:
> I just typed
>
> $ mount
>
> and I get
>
> /tmp on swap read/write/setuid on Mon Jan 22 16:39:32 2001
That's sufficiently suspicious.
Perhaps you could try to change the definition of DEFAULT_PGSOCKET_DIR in
src/include/config.h[.in] to something that's on a real disk.
Frank Joerdens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just typed
>
> $ mount
>
> and I get
>
> /tmp on swap read/write/setuid on Mon Jan 22 16:39:32 2001
>
> for the /tmp directory, which looks distinctly odd to me. What kind of
> device is swap (I know what swap is normally but I didn't know you co
Frank Joerdens writes:
> > That's bad, for sure. Maybe you can check for odd conditions surrounding
> > the /tmp directory, like is it on NFS, permission problems, mount options.
>
> I don't have neither root nor physical access to this machine, hence my
> options are kinda limited.
Entering 'm
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 05:12:02PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Frank Joerdens writes:
>
> > > I have experienced before that Unix sockets will cause random connection
> > > abortions on Solaris [ . . . ]
> >
> > Isn't that _really_ bad? Random connection abortions when going over
> > Unix so
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 05:12:02PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Frank Joerdens writes:
>
> > > I have experienced before that Unix sockets will cause random connection
> > > abortions on Solaris [ . . . ]
> >
> > Isn't that _really_ bad? Random connection abortions when going over
> > Unix so
Frank Joerdens writes:
> > I have experienced before that Unix sockets will cause random connection
> > abortions on Solaris [ . . . ]
>
> Isn't that _really_ bad? Random connection abortions when going over
> Unix sockets?? My app does _all_ the connecting over Unix sockets?!
That's bad, for su
Worked fine for me...
% uname -a
SunOS lancelot 5.7 Generic_106541-14 sun4m sparc SUNW,SPARCstation-4
% ls -l
-rw-r--r-- 1 bpalmer staff32860160 Jan 23 16:45
postgresql-snapshot.tar
...
...
...
transactions ... ok
random ... failed (ignored)
portals
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 12:42:45AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Frank Joerdens writes:
>
> [randomly varying set of regression tests fail]
>
> > Running the tests on my Linux box gives no failed tests. Must I assume
> > that those failed tests indicate some issue that is is detrimental to
>
Frank Joerdens writes:
[randomly varying set of regression tests fail]
> Running the tests on my Linux box gives no failed tests. Must I assume
> that those failed tests indicate some issue that is is detrimental to
> the proper functioning of the server on this Solaris installation? Do
> you wa
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 11:57:52AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
[ . . . ]
> After you build PG and test it, send us a port report, and we'll add
> Solaris 7 to the list of recently tested platforms. That's how it
> works ...
The installation by simply running configure, make, make install went
complet
21 matches
Mail list logo
