Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Saturday 04 July 2009 01:19:23 Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> a button says, "I am about to perform X".
>> A link *always* says, "I am about to go to a new web page".
>
> That was my feeling.
In addition, if the action will be preceded by a dialog (for options
or confir
On Jul 4, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
wrote:
Le 5 juil. 09 à 00:13, Peter Eisentraut a écrit :
On Saturday 04 July 2009 01:19:23 Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Not arguing one way or the other, a button says, "I am about to
perform
X". A link *always* says, "I am about to go to a new web p
Le 5 juil. 09 à 00:13, Peter Eisentraut a écrit :
On Saturday 04 July 2009 01:19:23 Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Not arguing one way or the other, a button says, "I am about to
perform
X". A link *always* says, "I am about to go to a new web page".
That was my feeling.
And bots (google etc) will
On Saturday 04 July 2009 01:19:23 Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 17:57 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > I guess I'm not really seeing why that particular thing should be a
> > button rather than a link. It would mess up the formatting for no
> > obvious benefit.
>
> Not arguing one wa
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Friday 03 July 2009 07:57:35 Robert Haas wrote:
>> We're still hacking on a few other details of the formatting and
>> interface, but you might want to cruise over and have a look.
>
> One thing that I noticed it that it takes too many cl
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 17:57 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>> I guess I'm not really seeing why that particular thing should be a
>> button rather than a link. It would mess up the formatting for no
>> obvious benefit.
>>
>
> Not arguing one wa
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 17:57 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I guess I'm not really seeing why that particular thing should be a
> button rather than a link. It would mess up the formatting for no
> obvious benefit.
>
Not arguing one way or the other, a button says, "I am about to perform
X". A link
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 16:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut writes:
>> > And please make "Delete Patch" into a button instead of a link.
>>
>> Only if there's some kind of confirmation ...
>
> Should we actually delete patches? I
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 16:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
> > And please make "Delete Patch" into a button instead of a link.
>
> Only if there's some kind of confirmation ...
Should we actually delete patches? I get removing them from the list but
it seems there could be ben
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> And please make "Delete Patch" into a button instead of a link.
Only if there's some kind of confirmation ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://
On Friday 03 July 2009 07:57:35 Robert Haas wrote:
> We're still hacking on a few other details of the formatting and
> interface, but you might want to cruise over and have a look.
One thing that I noticed it that it takes too many clicks in general to make a
set of changes. When I look at a pa
Per Dave Page's request of this morning, my CommitFest management
application now has a real hostname (see subject line). I have also
sent Dave an email with details of the install process and location of
files, per his request (let me know if there's somewhere else those
details should be posted)
12 matches
Mail list logo
