On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 11:49:25PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
It seems someone removed some include files in revision 1.11 from
interfaces/ecpg/pgtypeslib/numeric.c. One of them was limits.h,
which is needed for INT_MAX and LONG_MAX.
Hmm, I added postgres_fe.h and removed all includes that I
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 04:20:09PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
bash-2.05b$ flex -V
flex 2.5.31
I have 2.5.4.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
ICQ: 179140304, AIM: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use
Ok, trying again with integer datetimes off and recode off it gets a bit
further:
/usr/bin//flex -o'pgc.c' pgc.l
gcc -O0 -g -pg -DLINUX_PROFILE -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations
-Wno-error -I./../include -I. -I../../../../src/include -DMAJOR_VERSION=3
-DMINOR_VERSION=0
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 02:00:49PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
Ok, trying again with integer datetimes off and recode off it gets a bit
further:
What exactly was special on your site? This surely works for me.
pgc.c:3429: warning: no previous prototype for `yyget_lineno'
...
These are
Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 02:00:49PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
Ok, trying again with integer datetimes off and recode off it gets a bit
further:
What exactly was special on your site? This surely works for me.
pgc.c:3429: warning: no previous
It seems someone removed some include files in revision 1.11 from
interfaces/ecpg/pgtypeslib/numeric.c. One of them was limits.h,
which is needed for INT_MAX and LONG_MAX.
Readding it fixes it.
Kurt
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you
#include limits.h readded. Thanks.
---
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
It seems someone removed some include files in revision 1.11 from
interfaces/ecpg/pgtypeslib/numeric.c. One of them was limits.h,
which is needed for INT_MAX
Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perhaps it's a bug in flex? I have:
bash-2.05b$ flex -V
flex 2.5.31
There's your problem. See
http://fts.postgresql.org/db/msg.html?mid=1366520
Personally I'm still running 2.5.4 ...
regards, tom lane