On tor, 2011-05-26 at 17:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > We could also do that globally, but that would probably be something
> for
> > the next release.
>
> Hmm. I'm a bit scared of how much might break. I don't think the
> autoconf tests are generally designed to guarantee no warnings.
Yeah, I
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
> > On tor, 2011-05-26 at 12:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I tried this on my HP-UX 10.20 box, and it didn't work very nicely:
> >> configure decided that the compiler accepted +Olibmerrno, so I got a
> >> compile full
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On tor, 2011-05-26 at 12:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I tried this on my HP-UX 10.20 box, and it didn't work very nicely:
>> configure decided that the compiler accepted +Olibmerrno, so I got a
>> compile full of
>> cc: warning 450: Unrecognized option +Olibmerrno.
On tor, 2011-05-26 at 12:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ibrar Ahmed writes:
> > Please find the updated patch. I have added this "+Olibmerrno" compile flag
> > check in configure/configure.in file.
>
> I tried this on my HP-UX 10.20 box, and it didn't work very nicely:
> configure decided that the c
Ibrar Ahmed writes:
> Please find the updated patch. I have added this "+Olibmerrno" compile flag
> check in configure/configure.in file.
I tried this on my HP-UX 10.20 box, and it didn't work very nicely:
configure decided that the compiler accepted +Olibmerrno, so I got a
compile full of
Please find the updated patch. I have added this "+Olibmerrno" compile flag
check in configure/configure.in file.
OS
HP-UX B.11.31 U ia64
without patch
---
postgres=# select acos(2);
acos
--
NaN
(1 row)
with patch
---
postgres=# select acos(2);
ERROR: input is
Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> So the default is indeed non-standard. But I wonder if we should use -Aa
> instead?
Probably not; at least on older HPUX versions, -Aa turns off access to
assorted stuff that we do want, eg "long long". "man cc" on my box
saith
-Amode Specify the compi
On 24.05.2011 20:56, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I have been whining for years about the lack of HP-UX support (both for
gcc and their compiler) on the buildfarm. I really really wish HP would
come to the party and supply some equipment and software. Failing that,
some spare cycles being made available
On 24.05.2011 20:44, Tom Lane wrote:
BTW, is it really true that HP decided they could make the compiler's
default behavior violate the C standard so flagrantly? I could believe
offering a switch that you had to specify to save a few cycles at the
cost of nonstandard behavior; but if your report
On 05/24/2011 01:44 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Ibrar Ahmed writes:
I have found a problem which is specifically related to "HP-UX" compiler.
All 'libm' functions on "HP-UX Integrity server" do not set "errno" by
default. For 'errno' setting we should compile the code using +Olibmerrno
option. So we
Ibrar Ahmed writes:
> I have found a problem which is specifically related to "HP-UX" compiler.
> All 'libm' functions on "HP-UX Integrity server" do not set "errno" by
> default. For 'errno' setting we should compile the code using +Olibmerrno
> option. So we should add this option in "/src/make
I have found a problem which is specifically related to "HP-UX" compiler.
All 'libm' functions on "HP-UX Integrity server" do not set "errno" by
default. For 'errno' setting we should compile the code using +Olibmerrno
option. So we should add this option in "/src/makefiles/Makefile.hpux".
Otherwi
12 matches
Mail list logo
