On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > OK, we got _that_ answer. Looks like gborg. Marc really wants to pump
> > that up.
>
> I think if gborg had a different name and looked more like the main site,
> more people would consider using it without feeling "kick
interesting.
>From: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Gavin Sherry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [HACKERS] journaling in
Bruce Momjian writes:
> OK, we got _that_ answer. Looks like gborg. Marc really wants to pump
> that up.
I think if gborg had a different name and looked more like the main site,
more people would consider using it without feeling "kicked out".
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 12:47, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > > They are moving pgaccess more into the admin role, and pgmonitor fit in
> > > > with that.
> > >
> > > Personally, I kinda like to be able to run admin modularize
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > > They are moving pgaccess more into the admin role, and pgmonitor fit in
> > > > with that.
> > >
> > > Personally, I kinda like to be able to run admin modularized ... they
> > > *should* be
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > They are moving pgaccess more into the admin role, and pgmonitor fit in
> > > with that.
> >
> > Personally, I kinda like to be able to run admin modularized ... they
> > *should* be looking at stuff like webmin, where you
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > They are moving pgaccess more into the admin role, and pgmonitor fit in
> > with that.
>
> Personally, I kinda like to be able to run admin modularized ... they
> *should* be looking at stuff like webmin, where you can plug-n-play admin
> functions as required, or hord
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > > Anything in contrib that can be built seperately from the server code,
> > > > that just requires libpq and headers, should be pulled and dis
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > Anything in contrib that can be built seperately from the server code,
> > > that just requires libpq and headers, should be pulled and distributed as
> > > seperate modules, which has the adde
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > Anything in contrib that can be built seperately from the server code,
> > that just requires libpq and headers, should be pulled and distributed as
> > seperate modules, which has the added benefit that, if listed on GBorg,
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Anything in contrib that can be built seperately from the server code,
> that just requires libpq and headers, should be pulled and distributed as
> seperate modules, which has the added benefit that, if listed on GBorg,
> search engines will pick up the modules ...
>
>
Tom Lane wrote:
> I'd suggest dropping the talk slides (and you might as well flatten the
> thing into one directory). Perhaps instead the README could include a
> pointer to where to find the talk slides on-line. That'd bring it down
> to half a dozen K which is a more appropriate size for a co
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Gavin Sherry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> I think this belongs on gborg. Would you create a project there?
>
> > A number of people at OSCON did consider this to be a nice contrib
> > feature. Out of curious
Gavin Sherry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> I think this belongs on gborg. Would you create a project there?
> A number of people at OSCON did consider this to be a nice contrib
> feature. Out of curiousity, what makes it more suitable for gborg?
I th
/contrib is mostly porting tools and loadable modules. We are actually
trying to trim down /contrib too, so I was afraid it wouldn't work.
If you want, post the code to patches and ask if it should be added to
/contrib. I will do it if I can get agreement.
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> I think this belongs on gborg. Would you create a project there?
Bruce,
A number of people at OSCON did consider this to be a nice contrib
feature. Out of curiousity, what makes it more suitable for gborg?
Thanks,
Gavin
--
I think this belongs on gborg. Would you create a project there?
---
Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
>
> At my talk at the Oreilly Open Source Convention I have presented a
> simple tool for journaling databases.
> Tom Lane h
17 matches
Mail list logo
