On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-04-02 23:50:19 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
>> > > I just tried it on clang. It builds clean with -Wc11-extensions except
>> > > warning about _Static_assert(). That's possibly fixable with some
>> > > autoconf trickery.
>> >
>> > Ah.
On 2014-04-02 23:50:19 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > I just tried it on clang. It builds clean with -Wc11-extensions except
> > > warning about _Static_assert(). That's possibly fixable with some
> > > autoconf trickery.
> >
> > Ah. That sounds promising. What clang version is that?
>
> It'
On 2014-04-02 15:03:47 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2014-04-02 14:36:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Well, in any case, people very seldom check to see if any buildfarm
> >> members are producing compiler warnings. You need the build to actually
> >> go red to get anyone's
On 2014-04-02 14:42:39 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2014-04-02 13:56:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> We really need to get a buildfarm member going that complains about this.
> >> I had hoped to install a sufficiently old gcc version on prairiedog or
> >> dromedary, but did
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2014-04-02 14:36:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, in any case, people very seldom check to see if any buildfarm
>> members are producing compiler warnings. You need the build to actually
>> go red to get anyone's attention reliably.
> Yea, we'd need to be able to tur
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2014-04-02 13:56:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> We really need to get a buildfarm member going that complains about this.
>> I had hoped to install a sufficiently old gcc version on prairiedog or
>> dromedary, but didn't have much luck rebuilding ancient gcc releases on
>>
On 2014-04-02 14:36:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2014-04-02 15:17:16 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> We really need to get a buildfarm member going that complains about this.
>
> >> Complain how? I find that gcc -std=c90 -pedantic emits these w
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2014-04-02 15:17:16 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> We really need to get a buildfarm member going that complains about this.
>> Complain how? I find that gcc -std=c90 -pedantic emits these warnings about
>> it:
>> def.c:3:24: warning: ISO C90 doesn
On 2014-04-02 15:17:16 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Same issue as in
> > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/31718.1394059...@sss.pgh.pa.us
> >
> > In file included from jsonb.c:19:
> > ../../../../src/include/utils/jsonb.h:195: warning: unnamed struct/union
> > that define
On 2014-04-02 13:56:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> We really need to get a buildfarm member going that complains about this.
> I had hoped to install a sufficiently old gcc version on prairiedog or
> dromedary, but didn't have much luck rebuilding ancient gcc releases on
> OS X.
Some experimentation
Tom Lane wrote:
> Same issue as in
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/31718.1394059...@sss.pgh.pa.us
>
> In file included from jsonb.c:19:
> ../../../../src/include/utils/jsonb.h:195: warning: unnamed struct/union that
> defines no instances
> jsonb.c: In function `jsonb_in_object_field_start
Same issue as in
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/31718.1394059...@sss.pgh.pa.us
In file included from jsonb.c:19:
../../../../src/include/utils/jsonb.h:195: warning: unnamed struct/union that
defines no instances
jsonb.c: In function `jsonb_in_object_field_start':
jsonb.c:250: structure has
12 matches
Mail list logo
