Re: [HACKERS] missing $PostgreSQL:$

2008-05-17 Thread Marko Kreen
On 5/17/08, Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > second pass. There are 130 files in this list. Offhand I'd say the vast > majority should have markers. > > > > Yeah, that list looks reasonably sane. The main thing I was

Re: [HACKERS] missing $PostgreSQL:$

2008-05-16 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Yeah, that list looks reasonably sane. The main thing I was worried >> about was not plastering PostgreSQL markers on files that are simply >> imported from an upstream source, like the zic database and the >> libstemmer files. > The

Re: [HACKERS] missing $PostgreSQL:$

2008-05-16 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane wrote: Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: second pass. There are 130 files in this list. Offhand I'd say the vast majority should have markers. Yeah, that list looks reasonably sane. The main thing I was worried about was not plastering PostgreSQL markers on files t

Re: [HACKERS] missing $PostgreSQL:$

2008-05-15 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > second pass. There are 130 files in this list. Offhand I'd say the vast > majority should have markers. Yeah, that list looks reasonably sane. The main thing I was worried about was not plastering PostgreSQL markers on files that are simply imported f

Re: [HACKERS] missing $PostgreSQL:$

2008-05-14 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Alvaro Herrera wrote: Andrew Dunstan wrote: Here's a very early cut. Tell me what extra intelligence you want and I'll work something up. It certainly looks to me like many of these should have markers. There are probably some other files we should be checking, too. I suggest a

Re: [HACKERS] missing $PostgreSQL:$

2008-05-14 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Here's a very early cut. Tell me what extra intelligence you want and > I'll work something up. It certainly looks to me like many of these > should have markers. There are probably some other files we should be > checking, too. I suggest adding -name "*.mk" and excl

Re: [HACKERS] missing $PostgreSQL:$

2008-05-14 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andrew Dunstan wrote: Do we have a script that goes looking for such files? Do we need one? I don't think we have one but it would be nice to have. Only if it's bright enough to know about files that we inte

Re: [HACKERS] missing $PostgreSQL:$

2008-05-14 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> Do we have a script that goes looking for such files? Do we need one? > I don't think we have one but it would be nice to have. Only if it's bright enough to know about files that we intentionally don't put $PostgreSQL$ into ...

Re: [HACKERS] missing $PostgreSQL:$

2008-05-14 Thread Bruce Momjian
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > I have just noticed that pg_standby.c is missing a $PostgreSQL:$ line. > > Do we have a script that goes looking for such files? Do we need one? I don't think we have one but it would be nice to have. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://momjian.us

[HACKERS] missing $PostgreSQL:$

2008-05-14 Thread Andrew Dunstan
I have just noticed that pg_standby.c is missing a $PostgreSQL:$ line. Do we have a script that goes looking for such files? Do we need one? cheers andrew -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mail