Hi all,
Would it be beneficial for us to extend "pg_config" to update the
postgresql.conf file?
i.e.
pg_config --sort_mem 16384 --shared_buffers 800
pg_config -d /some/datadir --sort_mem 16384 --shared_buffers 800
etc?
Not sure if it should trigger a restart of postmaster, etc, but the
conce
Justin Clift writes:
> Would it be beneficial for us to extend "pg_config" to update the
> postgresql.conf file?
That has nothing to do with pg_config's functions.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscrib
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Justin Clift writes:
>
> > Would it be beneficial for us to extend "pg_config" to update the
> > postgresql.conf file?
>
> That has nothing to do with pg_config's functions.
At present, sure. Was thinking a tool for command line changes of
postgresql.conf parameter
Justin Clift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would it be beneficial for us to extend "pg_config" to update the
> postgresql.conf file?
This seems far outside pg_config's charter. It is a simple
information reporter that can be run by anybody. Making it able
to mess with (or even look at) postgres
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Justin Clift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Would it be beneficial for us to extend "pg_config" to update the
> > postgresql.conf file?
>
> This seems far outside pg_config's charter. It is a simple
> information reporter that can be run by anybody. Maki
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Obviously he wants a tool that allows setting parameters from a shell
> script or something for use within pg_autotune. I don't see why it is
> bad to have a tool to do this; if someone can use it (and modify
> postgresql.conf) obviously he has permission to read (and writ
Joe Conway wrote:
>
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Obviously he wants a tool that allows setting parameters from a shell
> > script or something for use within pg_autotune. I don't see why it is
> > bad to have a tool to do this; if someone can use it (and modify
> > postgresql.conf) obviously he h
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This seems far outside pg_config's charter.
> Obviously he wants a tool that allows setting parameters from a shell
> script or something for use within pg_autotune. I don't see why it is
> bad to have a tool to
