Jeffrey Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The two tables are defined the same way, but one of them gets dumped with a
SERIAL declaration and the other gets dumped with a DEFAULT nextval().
Is it possible that pg_dump became confused if transaction was renamed
transaction_backup and then
It is impossible to dump (with pg_dump -Ocx) and restore (with psql) a
database which contains sequences in any of 8.1, 8.2, or 8.3:
[...]
--
-- Name: transaction_transaction_id_seq; Type: SEQUENCE SET; Schema:
mercado; Owner: prod
--
SELECT
Jeffrey Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is impossible to dump (with pg_dump -Ocx) and restore (with psql) a
database which contains sequences in any of 8.1, 8.2, or 8.3:
I should think we would have heard about it before now if such a
sweeping claim were true.
What I suspect is that you are
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeffrey Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is impossible to dump (with pg_dump -Ocx) and restore (with psql) a
database which contains sequences in any of 8.1, 8.2, or 8.3:
I should think we would have heard about it
Jeffrey Baker escribió:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeffrey Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is impossible to dump (with pg_dump -Ocx) and restore (with psql) a
database which contains sequences in any of 8.1, 8.2, or 8.3:
I should think we
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jeffrey Baker escribió:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeffrey Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is impossible to dump (with pg_dump -Ocx) and restore (with psql)
a
Jeffrey Baker escribió:
The table was originally created this way:
CREATE TABLE transaction
(
transaction_id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
buyer_account_idINTEGER,
seller_account_id INTEGER,
dateDATE,
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jeffrey Baker escribió:
The table was originally created this way:
Okay, but was it created on 8.1 or was it already created on an older
version and restored? I don't see this behavior if I create it in 8.1
-- the field is dumped as SERIAL, unlike
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jeffrey Baker escribió:
The table was originally created this way:
Okay, but was it created on 8.1 or was it already created on an older
version and restored? I don't see this
