Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
ok, I accept all comments.
revised version are attached.
Applied with minor editorialization.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
2010/1/19 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
ok, I accept all comments.
revised version are attached.
Applied with minor editorialization.
thank you
Pavel
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
2010/1/12 Takahiro Itagaki itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp:
Hi, I'm reviewing OPEN FOR EXECUTE USING patch and have a couple of
trivial comments.
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
this small patch add missing USING clause to OPEN FOR EXECUTE statement
+ cleaning part of
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
ok, I accept all comments.
revised version are attached.
Good. This patch is ready to commit. I'll do it soon if no objections.
BTW, I found inconsistent parameter dumps in the codes. Some of them
add '$', but others does not. Are they
2010/1/14 Takahiro Itagaki itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
ok, I accept all comments.
revised version are attached.
Good. This patch is ready to commit. I'll do it soon if no objections.
BTW, I found inconsistent parameter dumps in the codes.
Hi, I'm reviewing OPEN FOR EXECUTE USING patch and have a couple of
trivial comments.
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
this small patch add missing USING clause to OPEN FOR EXECUTE statement
+ cleaning part of exec_stmt_open function
- Can we use read_sql_expression2() instead of
Hello,
this small patch add missing USING clause to OPEN FOR EXECUTE statement
+ cleaning part of exec_stmt_open function
see http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-11/msg00713.php
Regards
Pavel Stehule
*** ./doc/src/sgml/plpgsql.sgml.orig 2009-11-13 23:43:39.0 +0100
---
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
this small patch add missing USING clause to OPEN FOR EXECUTE statement
+ cleaning part of exec_stmt_open function
see http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-11/msg00713.php
This is now the
2009/11/17 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
this small patch add missing USING clause to OPEN FOR EXECUTE statement
+ cleaning part of exec_stmt_open function
see
2009/11/17 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com:
2009/11/17 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
this small patch add missing USING clause to OPEN FOR EXECUTE statement
+ cleaning part of exec_stmt_open
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/17 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
This is now the fourth patch you've submitted since the start of
the CommitFest...
These patches are for next commitfest. What I know, the current
commitfest is closed for new patches. Is it ok?
2009/11/17 Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/17 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
This is now the fourth patch you've submitted since the start of
the CommitFest...
These patches are for next commitfest. What I know, the
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 14:33 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/17 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
This is now the fourth patch you've submitted since the start of
the CommitFest...
These patches are for next commitfest. What I
2009/11/17 Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com:
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 14:33 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/17 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
This is now the fourth patch you've submitted since the start of
the CommitFest...
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
I never sent these (last two) patches to THIS commitfest. Is it
clean?
Counting the In Progress commitfest and the two preceding ones, you
have submitted nine patches and contributed to the review of none.
Surely you noticed recent threads about
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 15:40 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
I never sent these (last two) patches to THIS commitfest. Is it
clean?
I'm sure it would be much appreciated, and help to alleviate the
frustration and burnout of some other
Pavel Stehule wrote:
I don't wont to apply these patches tomorrow, I don't sending these
patches for last moment. If I have to wait one weak or two weeks, ok.
Declare it. I'll respect it. But actually I respecting all rules, what
I know.
If you're sending stuff intended for the next
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Pavel Stehule wrote:
I don't wont to apply these patches tomorrow, I don't sending these
patches for last moment. If I have to wait one weak or two weeks, ok.
Declare it. I'll respect it. But actually I respecting all
2009/11/17 Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com:
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 15:40 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
I never sent these (last two) patches to THIS commitfest. Is it
clean?
I'm sure it would be much appreciated, and help to alleviate the
2009/11/17 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Pavel Stehule wrote:
I don't wont to apply these patches tomorrow, I don't sending these
patches for last moment. If I have to wait one weak or two weeks, ok.
Declare it.
20 matches
Mail list logo