Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 21:29, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Do you use --enable-depend when configuring? I don't, so I know that
>> I take some risk of build errors when I do things wrong.
> Yeah, I did -- which I why when I reported it initially I assumed that a
> b
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 21:29, Tom Lane wrote:
> Do you use --enable-depend when configuring? I don't, so I know that
> I take some risk of build errors when I do things wrong.
Yeah, I did -- which I why when I reported it initially I assumed that a
build problem wasn't the cause.
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I suppose we can just regard it as a build problem, then? Not sure what
> the actual culprit was, though...
I'm mystified too. But unless we see it again, I think we have to write
it off as a build error.
Do you use --enable-depend when configuring? I d
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 12:41, Tom Lane wrote:
> Can you still reproduce the problem after a clean rebuild?
No -- I ran "cvs update", "make clean", followed by 10 runs of the
regression tests but I didn't get any similar failures.
I suppose we can just regard it as a build problem, then? Not sure w
Tom Lane wrote:
I've spent the morning trying to reproduce this, without success. After
a "make maintainer-clean", cvs update, full rebuild cycle, I cannot get
anything funny to happen in "make check" under HPUX, RH Linux 8.0, or
OS X.
I'm a bit hesitant to write it off as a build problem, because
I said:
> Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> About 1 in every 5 runs of the (parallel) regression tests are failing
>> for me with CVS HEAD: the triggers, inherit, vacuum, sanity_check, and
>> misc tests fail. I can make the failures occur fairly consistently by
>> running "make check" over
> Yipes. I have not been running the parallel tests (my habit is to run
> make installcheck, instead) but there is clearly something busted.
> I got a bunch of failures similar to yours in my first attempt with
> make check on HPUX --- see attached.
>
> > Any ideas on what the cause might be?
>
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> About 1 in every 5 runs of the (parallel) regression tests are failing
> for me with CVS HEAD: the triggers, inherit, vacuum, sanity_check, and
> misc tests fail. I can make the failures occur fairly consistently by
> running "make check" over and over agai
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 17:05, Doug McNaught wrote:
> Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > About 1 in every 5 runs of the (parallel) regression tests are failing
> > for me with CVS HEAD: the triggers, inherit, vacuum, sanity_check, and
> > misc tests fail. I can make the failures occur fai
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> About 1 in every 5 runs of the (parallel) regression tests are failing
> for me with CVS HEAD: the triggers, inherit, vacuum, sanity_check, and
> misc tests fail. I can make the failures occur fairly consistently by
> running "make check" over and over aga
About 1 in every 5 runs of the (parallel) regression tests are failing
for me with CVS HEAD: the triggers, inherit, vacuum, sanity_check, and
misc tests fail. I can make the failures occur fairly consistently by
running "make check" over and over again until the problem crops up.
The platform is L
11 matches
Mail list logo
