Ian Barwick wrote:
> On 17/10/15 04:31, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Robert Haas wrote:
> >>> The other item on me is the documentation patch by Emre Hasegeli for
> >>> usage of the inclusion opclass framework in BRIN. I think it needs some
> >>> slight revision by some native English speaker and
Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 14 October 2015 at 09:57, Robert Haas wrote:
> > We've got a few open items remaining at
> > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items - we should
> > try to get rid of them.
>
> I'd like to add, rather than remove, one. A bug in
On 14 October 2015 at 09:57, Robert Haas wrote:
> We've got a few open items remaining at
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items - we should
> try to get rid of them.
I'd like to add, rather than remove, one. A bug in replication origins
support. It
On 17/10/15 04:31, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>>> The other item on me is the documentation patch by Emre Hasegeli for
>>> usage of the inclusion opclass framework in BRIN. I think it needs some
>>> slight revision by some native English speaker and I'm not completely in
>>> love
On 16 October 2015 at 20:17, Robert Haas wrote:
>> - DDL deparsing testing module should have detected that transforms
> >> were not supported, but it failed to notice that. There's no thread
> >> linked to this one either, but the description of the issue seems
> >>
Simon Riggs writes:
> On 16 October 2015 at 20:17, Robert Haas wrote:
- DDL deparsing testing module should have detected that transforms
were not supported, but it failed to notice that. There's no thread
linked to this one either,
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> What would happen if we didn't do anything at all?
>>
>> Nothing, really. It's essentially some code beautification. A worthwhile
>> goal, but
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> - Oversize item computation needs more testing (c.f. ereport(ERROR)
>> calls in brin_getinsertbuffer). This is pretty vague, and there's no
>> thread linked. If there's a stability issue
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> wrote:
> > Robert Haas wrote:
> >> - Oversize item computation needs more testing (c.f. ereport(ERROR)
> >> calls in brin_getinsertbuffer). This is pretty vague, and there's no
> >> thread linked.
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
> We've got a few open items remaining at
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items - we should
> try to get rid of them. Of the 8 items there, 3 are documentation
> issues. It looks to me like one of those is for Stephen to deal
Robert Haas wrote:
> - Oversize item computation needs more testing (c.f. ereport(ERROR)
> calls in brin_getinsertbuffer). This is pretty vague, and there's no
> thread linked. If there's a stability issue here, presumably it falls
> to Alvaro to fix it. But I don't know who added this item or
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> What would happen if we didn't do anything at all?
>
> Nothing, really. It's essentially some code beautification. A worthwhile
> goal, but certainly not a release blocker.
While I agree with this assessment, I think
On 2015-10-13 21:57:15 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> - Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little.
> Andres seems to think this shouldn't be an open issue, while Peter
> thinks maybe it should be, or at least that's my imperfect executive
> summary. Heikki isn't sure he agrees
We've got a few open items remaining at
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items - we should
try to get rid of them. Of the 8 items there, 3 are documentation
issues. It looks to me like one of those is for Stephen to deal with,
one for Andres, and one for Alvaro. Is there any
14 matches
Mail list logo