Re: [HACKERS] removing =>(text, text) in 9.2

2011-11-15 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas writes: > Thanks for the review. New version attached. This looks sane to me too (though I only read the patch and didn't actually test upgrading). regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to yo

Re: [HACKERS] removing =>(text, text) in 9.2

2011-11-07 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas writes: >> Thanks for the review.  New version attached. > > This looks sane to me too (though I only read the patch and didn't > actually test upgrading). OK, committed. Thanks for the reviews, all. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: ht

Re: [HACKERS] removing =>(text, text) in 9.2

2011-11-04 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > Robert Haas writes: >> Hmm, I was kind of expecting that to be wrong at least in some minor way. > >> +/* contrib/hstore/hstore-1.0-1.1.sql */ >> + >> +-- complain if script is sourced in psql, rather than via CREATE EXTENSION >> +\echo U

Re: [HACKERS] removing =>(text, text) in 9.2

2011-11-03 Thread Dimitri Fontaine
Robert Haas writes: > Hmm, I was kind of expecting that to be wrong at least in some minor way. > +/* contrib/hstore/hstore-1.0-1.1.sql */ > + > +-- complain if script is sourced in psql, rather than via CREATE EXTENSION > +\echo Use "ALTER EXTENSION hstore" to load this file. \quit You could me

Re: [HACKERS] removing =>(text, text) in 9.2

2011-11-02 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:36 AM, David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Nov 1, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >>> Fair enough. >> >> So, I tried to work up a patch for this, but I'm actually a bit >> confused about what needs to be done here.  I'll attach what I've got >> so far as a starting point f

Re: [HACKERS] removing =>(text, text) in 9.2

2011-11-01 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Nov 1, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >> Fair enough. > > So, I tried to work up a patch for this, but I'm actually a bit > confused about what needs to be done here. I'll attach what I've got > so far as a starting point for discussion. Looks reasonable, if verbose. (Yes, the extensi

[HACKERS] removing =>(text, text) in 9.2

2011-11-01 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas writes: >> +1.  However, if that's the route we're traveling down, I think we had >> better go ahead and remove the one remaining => operator from hstore >> in 9.2: > > Fair enough. So, I tried to work up a patch for this, but I'm ac