On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> I'm back now and will act as advertised.
I've revoked the performance aspect. The difference between release
and commit has been maintained since it makes the code easier to
understand.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadran
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Andy Colson wrote:
>>> This patch:
>>>
>>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=605
>>>
>>> Seems to have been after thoughts, and back burner stuff, and forgotten
>>> about
Robert Haas writes:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Andy Colson wrote:
>> This patch:
>>
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=605
>>
>> Seems to have been after thoughts, and back burner stuff, and forgotten
>> about...
>>
>> Has it already been commit?
>>
>> http://arc
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Andy Colson wrote:
> This patch:
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=605
>
> Seems to have been after thoughts, and back burner stuff, and forgotten
> about...
>
> Has it already been commit?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers
This patch:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=605
Seems to have been after thoughts, and back burner stuff, and forgotten about...
Has it already been commit?
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2011-07/msg00206.php
Oh, wait, nevermind, it was revoked and rewo
