[note change of subject]
I wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I did think about using a cluster-wide sequence, if we can make such
a thing (might also be useful for system generated UIDs too).
Not a good idea IMHO. If you do that, then there will be no
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I did think about using a cluster-wide sequence, if we can make such
a thing (might also be useful for system generated UIDs too).
Not a good idea IMHO. If you do that, then there will be no such thing
as a purely
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I am less sure of the utility of such an ID, though. After all, if
you see a disconnect log message for a given PID you must know that
any reuse of that PID indicates a new session, or even if you just
see a connection message you know it must be a new session. OTOH,
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I am less sure of the utility of such an ID, though. After all, if
you see a disconnect log message for a given PID you must know that
any reuse of that PID indicates a new session, or even if you just
see a connection message you know it must be
--On Tuesday, February 03, 2004 11:12:03 -0500 Andrew Dunstan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I am less sure of the utility of such an ID, though. After all, if
you see a disconnect log message for a given PID you must know that
any reuse of that PID
