Tom Lane wrote:
> Kevin Grittner writes:
>>> If we were a little earlier in the release cycle I would argue that
>>> if we're going to do anything with this column we should drop it.
>
>> Which is exactly what I think we should do as soon as we branch.
>
> If we're going to do that, there d
Kevin Grittner writes:
>> If we were a little earlier in the release cycle I would argue that
>> if we're going to do anything with this column we should drop it.
> Which is exactly what I think we should do as soon as we branch.
If we're going to do that, there doesn't seem to me to be a lot of
Kevin Grittner wrote:
> I'll leave this alone for a day. If nobody objects, I will change
> the ruleutils.c code to work with either value (to support
> pg_upgrade) and change the code to set this to zero, for 9.3 and
> forward only. I will change the 9.3 docs to mention that newly
> created ro
Tom Lane wrote:
> Kevin Grittner writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Actually, I think this is a bug and the right thing is to make the code
>>> match the documentation not vice versa.
>
>> I assume that this should be a 9.3 code fix, and a doc fix prior to
>> that, since it would require changing ca
Kevin Grittner writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Actually, I think this is a bug and the right thing is to make the code
>> match the documentation not vice versa.
> I assume that this should be a 9.3 code fix, and a doc fix prior to
> that, since it would require changing catalogs and might break
>
Tom Lane wrote:
> Actually, I think this is a bug and the right thing is to make the code
> match the documentation not vice versa. ev_attr isn't being used for
> much at the moment, but if it were being used as an AttrNumber, -1 would
> not mean "whole row". It would be a reference to the syst
Kevin Grittner writes:
> Hari Babu wrote:
>> system catalog pg_rewrite column ev_attr document description as shown below
>>
>> ev_attr - The column this rule is for (currently, always zero to indicate
>> the whole table)
>>
>> But In the code the column value is always set as -1. can we chang
Hari Babu wrote:
> system catalog pg_rewrite column ev_attr document description as shown below
>
> ev_attr - The column this rule is for (currently, always zero to indicate
> the whole table)
>
> But In the code the column value is always set as -1. can we change the
> column description as bel
Hi,
system catalog pg_rewrite column ev_attr document description as shown below
ev_attr - The column this rule is for (currently, always zero to indicate
the whole table)
But In the code the column value is always set as -1. can we change the
column description as below is fine?
ev_attr
