Re: [HACKERS] wal_level > WAL_LEVEL_LOGICAL

2017-05-25 Thread Neha Khatri
On Wed, 24 May 2017 at 10:29 pm, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Neha Khatri > wrote: > > As per my understabding, current postgres server supports only three > > values for wal_level i.e. 'minimal' , 'replica' or 'logical'.

Re: [HACKERS] wal_level > WAL_LEVEL_LOGICAL

2017-05-24 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Neha Khatri wrote: > As per my understabding, current postgres server supports only three > values for wal_level i.e. 'minimal' , 'replica' or 'logical'. But > following error message brought to notice that there are various code > spots

[HACKERS] wal_level > WAL_LEVEL_LOGICAL

2017-05-22 Thread Neha Khatri
As per my understabding, current postgres server supports only three values for wal_level i.e. 'minimal' , 'replica' or 'logical'. But following error message brought to notice that there are various code spots that try to look for wal_level >= WAL_LEVEL_LOGICAL: select * from