Am Montag, 28. April 2008 schrieb Martijn van Oosterhout:
> As one of those confused, it would be really nice if someone could
> summarise it all on a wiki page that we can point people to.
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TrackerDiscussion
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@po
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:55:18AM -0400, Chris Browne wrote:
> Yes, it is certainly fair to observe that there have been voluminous
> debates. But it will take a whole lot of "trolling around" in the
> archives to figure out the shape of the *conclusions* of those
> debates.
As one of those conf
Chris Browne wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Dunstan) writes:
Raphaël Jacquot wrote:
would seem like a good idea, no ?
http://www.murrayc.com/blog/permalink/2008/04/25/postgresql-has-no-bugzilla/
Before you come trolling on this (or any other) subject, please read
the volum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Dunstan) writes:
> Raphaël Jacquot wrote:
>> would seem like a good idea, no ?
>>
>> http://www.murrayc.com/blog/permalink/2008/04/25/postgresql-has-no-bugzilla/
>
> Before you come trolling on this (or any other) subject, please read
> the voluminous debates that have ta
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:58:01AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> So the proper thing to do is complain to the writer of the GUI app so
> that it has an option for showing the list headers, perhaps adding a
> menu entry when they are found.
At least in the case of Thunderbird, you already have an
Shane Ambler wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>> Maybe because there's a perfectly functional archive link in the mail
>> headers? And because there's an RFC that tells us how such headers
>> are supposed to work?
>
> As a lot of people use gui apps, (I do seem to recall that mail cli
> shows th
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 08:54:46AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
How would he know to search at the archives?
* There is no archives signature at the bottom of -hackers lists
Maybe because there's a perfectly functional archive link in the mail
headers? And because th
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 08:54:46AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> How would he know to search at the archives?
>
> * There is no archives signature at the bottom of -hackers lists
Maybe because there's a perfectly functional archive link in the mail
headers? And because there's an RFC that te
Tom Lane wrote:
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
How would he know to search at the archives?
If he knew enough about the community to post in -hackers (as opposed
to, say, -general or -novice) he should certainly have heard of the
You think so? (not being sarcastic).
mailing
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How would he know to search at the archives?
If he knew enough about the community to post in -hackers (as opposed
to, say, -general or -novice) he should certainly have heard of the
mailing list archives. *You* might find 'em useless but I don't.
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I entered "bugzilla" on the archives search page and got this link,
right out of the recent discussion, at the top of the list:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-04/msg00764.php
That and a few similar results might have given the OP some hints about
wha
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Brendan Jurd wrote:
Having done that, please endeavour to make an actual contribution
to the
discussion.
Hi Andrew,
Let's be fair. It would be an almost impossible task to make any
sense of the archives on this topic without dedicating tens of hours
to the task,
Brendan Jurd wrote:
Having done that, please endeavour to make an actual contribution to the
discussion.
Hi Andrew,
Let's be fair. It would be an almost impossible task to make any
sense of the archives on this topic without dedicating tens of hours
to the task, and having access to a bett
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> Before you come trolling on this (or any other) subject, please read the
> voluminous debates that have taken place about it. Apparently you think it's
> something we have never considered, w
Raphaël Jacquot wrote:
would seem like a good idea, no ?
http://www.murrayc.com/blog/permalink/2008/04/25/postgresql-has-no-bugzilla/
Before you come trolling on this (or any other) subject, please read the
voluminous debates that have taken place about it. Apparently you think
it's some
would seem like a good idea, no ?
http://www.murrayc.com/blog/permalink/2008/04/25/postgresql-has-no-bugzilla/
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
16 matches
Mail list logo
