> I think at a minimum there should be a manual configuration switch
> (ie something in pg_config_manual.h) to allow the builder to disable
> use of posix_fadvise, even if configure thinks it's there. Depending
> on buildfarm results we may have to do more than that.
This seems pretty pointless,
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
> > The way I read this is that this was a temporary kernel/libc mismatch in
> > a development version of Debian 3 years ago that was fixed within 2
> > months of being reported and was never released to the general public.
> > So it would be on the sa
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> The way I read this is that this was a temporary kernel/libc mismatch in
> a development version of Debian 3 years ago that was fixed within 2
> months of being reported and was never released to the general public.
> So it would be on the same level as any of a milli
Gregory Stark wrote:
Peter Eisentraut writes:
On Friday 02 January 2009 06:49:57 Greg Stark wrote:
The guc run-time check is checking for known-buggy versions of glibc
using sysconf to check what version of glibc you have.
Could you please mention the bug number in the relevant source code
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On Friday 02 January 2009 06:49:57 Greg Stark wrote:
>> The guc run-time check is checking for known-buggy versions of glibc
>> using sysconf to check what version of glibc you have.
>
> Could you please mention the bug number in the relevant source code comments?
It
