VS).
Al.
- Original Message -
From: "scott.marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Al Sutton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Hannu Krosing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "bpalmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, Novem
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Al Sutton wrote:
> Hannu,
>
> Using a Win32 platform will allow them to perform relative metrics. I'm not
> looking for a statement saying things are x per cent faster than production,
> I'm looking for reproducable evidence that an improvement offers y per cent
> faster perf
ng up the extra machines my developers currently have.
Al.
- Original Message -
From: "Shridhar Daithankar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Native Win32 sources
> On 27 Nov
ED]>
To: "Al Sutton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "scott.marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "bpalmer"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 10:54 AM
Subject: [spam] Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Native Win32 sources
> On Wed, 200
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 08:21, Al Sutton wrote:
> The problem I have with VMWare is that for the cost of a licence plus the
> additional hardware on the box running it (CPU power, RAM, etc.) I can buy a
> second cheap machine, using VMWare doesn't appear to save me my biggest
> overheads of training
On 27 Nov 2002 at 8:21, Al Sutton wrote:
> The problem I have with VMWare is that for the cost of a licence plus the
> additional hardware on the box running it (CPU power, RAM, etc.) I can buy a
> second cheap machine, using VMWare doesn't appear to save me my biggest
> overheads of training staf
n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 9:13 PM
Subject: Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Native Win32 sources
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, bpalmer wrote:
>
> > > > D'Arcy,
> > > >
> > > > In production the databas
On 27 Nov 2002, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> scott.marlowe kirjutas K, 27.11.2002 kell 01:40:
> > On 27 Nov 2002, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> >
> > > You could try out VMWare and run a linux virtual machine under Windows,
> > > You could set it up once with all necessary servers and then copy the
> > > files
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, bpalmer wrote:
> > > D'Arcy,
> > >
> > > In production the database servers are seperate multi-processor machines
> > > with mirrored disks linked via Gigabit ethernet to the app server.
> > >
> > > In development I have people extremely familiar with MS, but not very hot
> >
scott.marlowe kirjutas K, 27.11.2002 kell 01:40:
> On 27 Nov 2002, Hannu Krosing wrote:
>
> > You could try out VMWare and run a linux virtual machine under Windows,
> > You could set it up once with all necessary servers and then copy the
> > files to each new developers machine.
> >
> > VMWare i
On 27 Nov 2002, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> Al Sutton kirjutas T, 26.11.2002 kell 20:37:
> > D'Arcy,
> >
> > In production the database servers are seperate multi-processor machines
> > with mirrored disks linked via Gigabit ethernet to the app server.
> >
> > In development I have people extremely f
> > D'Arcy,
> >
> > In production the database servers are seperate multi-processor machines
> > with mirrored disks linked via Gigabit ethernet to the app server.
> >
> > In development I have people extremely familiar with MS, but not very hot
> > with Unix in any flavour, who are developing Java
Al Sutton kirjutas T, 26.11.2002 kell 20:37:
> D'Arcy,
>
> In production the database servers are seperate multi-processor machines
> with mirrored disks linked via Gigabit ethernet to the app server.
>
> In development I have people extremely familiar with MS, but not very hot
> with Unix in any
Al Sutton wrote:
> Lee,
>
> I wouldn't go for 7.4 in production until after it's gone gold, but being
> able to cut the number of boxes per developer by giving them a Win32 native
> version would save on everything from the overhead of getting the developers
> familiar enough with Linux to be able
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Al Sutton wrote:
> D'Arcy,
>
> In production the database servers are seperate multi-processor machines
> with mirrored disks linked via Gigabit ethernet to the app server.
>
> In development I have people extremely familiar with MS, but not very hot
> with Unix in any flavo
t;
To: "Al Sutton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Lee Kindness" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Native Win32 sources
> On November 26, 2002 06:33 am, Al Sutton wrote:
> > I
On November 26, 2002 06:33 am, Al Sutton wrote:
> I wouldn't go for 7.4 in production until after it's gone gold, but being
> able to cut the number of boxes per developer by giving them a Win32 native
> version would save on everything from the overhead of getting the
> developers familiar enough
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Lee Kindness"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 9:08 AM
Subject: Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Native Win32 sources
> Al, to be honest I don't think the Windows native would save hassle,
> rather it&#
Al, to be honest I don't think the Windows native would save hassle,
rather it'd probably cause more! No disrespect to those doing the
version, read on for reasoning...
Yes, you get a beta of a Windows native version just now, yes it
probably will not be that long till the source is a available...
or me.
Al.
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ulrich Neumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 5:51 PM
Subject: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Native Win32 sources
> Ulrich Neumann wrote:
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
