Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> What would be worthwhile is setting up another cvs module so packages can
> be developed and released at their own pace.
This is an _excellent_ point, and one I had thought of before but had
forgotten.
FWIW, I have a project set up at greatbridge.org -- I just have to g
Karl DeBisschop wrote:
>
> Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> >
> > Rachit Siamwalla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Also i never got a response on who actually packages those linux init
> > > scripts that appear in the RPM but not on the pgsql cvs tree. (i am also
> > > curious on why it is di
Karl DeBisschop writes:
> PostgreSQL builds are great for the portability. The next logical step
> might in fact be to extend some of that consistency to the package
> creation arena.
This would have been cool in 1996. We would have evolved a large number
of different packages along with the bu
Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Seems like that stuff should be in CVS somewhere ... if only so someone
> > else can pick up the ball if you get run over by a truck :-(.
>
> My wife appreciates the sentiment :-). As it stands now, better
> documentation distributed in the source RPM w
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Perhaps src/rpm-tools/ or some such name.
> It is platform-specific, which would seem to vote for /contrib.
Huh? By that logic, all of src/makefiles/, src/template/, and
src/backend/port/, not to mention large chunks of the configure
mechanism, belon
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
>
> Rachit Siamwalla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Also i never got a response on who actually packages those linux init
> > scripts that appear in the RPM but not on the pgsql cvs tree. (i am also
> > curious on why it is different, and how the RPM is built).
>
> Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > contrib/rpm-dist?
>
> Contrib was my first thought also --- but on second thought, the RPM
> packaging support is hardly contrib-grade material. For a large
> proportion of our users it's a critical part of the distribution.
> So, if we are going to h
Lamar Owen writes:
> contrib/rpm-dist?
A separate CVS module sounds like a better idea to me.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please
Tom Lane wrote:
> Contrib was my first thought also --- but on second thought, the RPM
> packaging support is hardly contrib-grade material. For a large
> proportion of our users it's a critical part of the distribution.
> So, if we are going to have it in the CVS tree at all, I'd vote for
> putt
Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> contrib/rpm-dist?
Contrib was my first thought also --- but on second thought, the RPM
packaging support is hardly contrib-grade material. For a large
proportion of our users it's a critical part of the distribution.
So, if we are going to have it in the
Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As to why all these files aren't part of the source tree, well, unless
> there was a large cry for it to happen, I don't believe it should.
> PostgreSQL is very platform-agnostic -- and I like that. Including the
> RPM stuff as part of the Official Tarbal
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Rachit Siamwalla wrote:
> 1. `pidof` should be `pidof -s` (2 instances)
> 2. restart) should be stop; sleep x; start
> ideally, stop should actually wait till postgres fully stops. The sleep is
> just a temporary fix.
>
Perhaps a naive question, but why not use the pg_ctl for
Tom Lane wrote:
> Seems like that stuff should be in CVS somewhere ... if only so someone
> else can pick up the ball if you get run over by a truck :-(.
My wife appreciates the sentiment :-). As it stands now, better
documentation distributed in the source RPM would help greatly.
Everything ne
Rachit Siamwalla wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your total and complete description of the process. (i
> should have checked out the sprm first before asking). I empathize with
> what you said about packaging not being a simple task, i have been through
> the agony.
Empathize is appropriate if you've
Thanks a lot for your total and complete description of the process. (i
should have checked out the sprm first before asking). I empathize with
what you said about packaging not being a simple task, i have been through
the agony.
About putting your stuff into the postgres tree, i believe it wou
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
>
> Rachit Siamwalla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Also i never got a response on who actually packages those linux init
> > scripts that appear in the RPM but not on the pgsql cvs tree. (i am also
> > curious on why it is different, and how the RPM is built).
>
Rachit Siamwalla wrote:
> oh btw, i completely forgot to mention the minor fixes to the linux init
> scripts i mentioned earlier (about 2 weeks ago) for things that perhaps
> should be in the 7.1.1 release. (someone sent out a mail that they were
> branching 7.1.1)
> Also i never got a response o
Rachit Siamwalla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also i never got a response on who actually packages those linux init
> scripts that appear in the RPM but not on the pgsql cvs tree. (i am also
> curious on why it is different, and how the RPM is built).
Lamar Owen and I.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrø
Not sure on their status. Are they listed on the outstanding patches
page at the bottom of the developers page? Probably too late for 7.1.1
now.
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> oh btw, i completely forgot to mention the minor fixes to the linux init
> scripts i mentioned
oh btw, i completely forgot to mention the minor fixes to the linux init
scripts i mentioned earlier (about 2 weeks ago) for things that perhaps
should be in the 7.1.1 release. (someone sent out a mail that they were
branching 7.1.1)
Also i never got a response on who actually packages those linu
OK, Oleg, I am applying this on your word only. I don't understand its
purpose, but you sent it with a 7.1.1 subject so I assume you want it in
there. This is not a critical area of our code.
> Please,
>
> apply a little patch:
>
> --- src/test/locale/test-ctype.cTue Sep 1 08:40:33
Please,
apply a little patch:
--- src/test/locale/test-ctype.cTue Sep 1 08:40:33 1998
+++ /u/megera/app/locale/test/test-ctype.c Fri Sep 15 19:12:06 2000
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
void
describe_char(int c)
{
- charcp = c,
+ unsigned char cp = c,
22 matches
Mail list logo
