On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 11:05:11PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
I've never been a fan of regression tests in the narrow sense of
let's test for this specific mistake we made once. If you can devise
a test that catches a class of errors including the one you
Tom Lane wrote:
Log Message:
---
make_restrictinfo() failed to attach the specified required_relids to
its result when the clause was an OR clause. Brain fade exposed by
example from Sebastian B?ck.
I wonder if there should be regression tests for all the bugs exposed
after 8.1 ...
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wonder if there should be regression tests for all the bugs exposed
after 8.1 ... I mean, what stops anyone from introducing the same bugs
again?
I've never been a fan of regression tests in the narrow sense of
let's test for this specific mistake we
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
I've never been a fan of regression tests in the narrow sense of
let's test for this specific mistake we made once. If you can devise
a test that catches a class of errors including the one you actually
made, that's a different story, because it's much more
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 21:05, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
I've never been a fan of regression tests in the narrow sense of
let's test for this specific mistake we made once. If you can devise
a test that catches a class of errors including the one you
