Josh Berkus writes:
> Might I suggest changing the wording in the final release, then? The warning
> sure looked dangerous;
It only looks dangerous to those who don't actually read the full text of
the message.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadc
Tom,
> > Really? 'cause I got the warning from the Beta4 tarball.
>
> If you mean the configure warning, sure, but the build won't fail.
Might I suggest changing the wording in the final release, then? The warning
sure looked dangerous; I aborted the build and went looking for bison 1.875
bi
Josh Berkus wrote:
Peter,
I can't seem to find a Bison 1.875 RPM for a SuSE 8.1 machine I can't
afford
to upgrade right now. Does such an animal exist? Help!
Install it from source if you cannot find a package.
Hmmm ... still getting the "Bison Too Old" warning messag
Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> No, because it only matters to people who build from a CVS pull instead
>> of using a tarball. I'd think most of the people in the first category
>> have already dealt with the issue...
> Really? 'cause I got the warning from the Beta4 tarball.
If you
TOm,
> No, because it only matters to people who build from a CVS pull instead
> of using a tarball. I'd think most of the people in the first category
> have already dealt with the issue...
Really? 'cause I got the warning from the Beta4 tarball.
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (I predict that we're going to get many more questions about Bison after we
> release 7.4, since many major Linux distros don't yet include 1.875)
No, because it only matters to people who build from a CVS pull instead
of using a tarball. I'd think most
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:43 am, Josh Berkus wrote:
> (I predict that we're going to get many more questions about Bison after we
> release 7.4, since many major Linux distros don't yet include 1.875)
You only need bison if you are building from CVS - tarballs include the bison
output files (AFAIK -
Peter,
> If you installed from source into /usr/local/bin and you have an older
> version in /usr/bin, you may need to run 'hash -r' or 'rehash' to make the
> shell forget about the old installation in the path.
Yeah, that was it. Thanks!
(I predict that we're going to get many more questions a
Josh Berkus writes:
> Hmmm ... still getting the "Bison Too Old" warning message. How can I tell
> where Postgres is looking for Bison?
checking for bison... bison -y
^
I tells you right there.
If you installed from source into /usr/local/bin and you have an older
vers
Peter,
> > I can't seem to find a Bison 1.875 RPM for a SuSE 8.1 machine I can't
afford
> > to upgrade right now. Does such an animal exist? Help!
>
> Install it from source if you cannot find a package.
Hmmm ... still getting the "Bison Too Old" warning message. How can I tell
where Postg
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Josh Berkus writes:
I can't seem to find a Bison 1.875 RPM for a SuSE 8.1 machine I can't afford
to upgrade right now. Does such an animal exist? Help!
Install it from source if you cannot find a package.
or build from an SRPM - the dependencies are quite m
Josh Berkus writes:
> I can't seem to find a Bison 1.875 RPM for a SuSE 8.1 machine I can't afford
> to upgrade right now. Does such an animal exist? Help!
Install it from source if you cannot find a package.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadc
12 matches
Mail list logo
