Folks,
> What they don't say is whether that is a 50% speed up from the
> default settings or a 50% increase from a carefully hand tunes file.
AFAIT, most of their performance speed-up comes from two sources:
1) a carefully hand-tuned compile of Postgres using ICC, and
2) Improving on the default
Josh,
On 2/18/06 7:38 AM, "Luke Lonergan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I figure they'll have to do quite a lot to make progress in their chosen
> market, including:
>
> - SQL*Net protocol compatibility
> - Oracle Number datatype support
> - ROWID unique row identifier
> - Oracle Redo/Undo log fo
Josh,
On 2/18/06 7:15 AM, "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> EnterpriseDB is a fork of PostgreSQL that contains a reasonable level of
> pl/SQL (Oracle) compatibility.
> My understanding (and I could be wrong) is that they support packages,
> in, inout paramters etc.. in
> the same syn
I also wonder where their project is too - they seem publicly opaque about
progress, etc. From the web site's statements it looks like they've written
a tool to tune the postgresql.conf file from which they claim a 50%
speed-up, but that's not new or unique "fork-level" functionality.
Ente
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
http://www.flamingspork.com/blog/2006/02/16/enterprisedb-where-is-the-source/
Any comments on this? Is he referring to EnterpriseDB extensions that
they don't make public?
I think so. Trying to "battle" the perception that EnterpriseDB is an
open source data
Any comments on this? Is he referring to EnterpriseDB extensions
that
they don't make public?
I've noticed a lot of press lately is mentioning their name next to
ingres
as an alternative to MySQL, so the MySQL folks might be feeling some
Postgres heat from their direction.
I also wonder w
Christoper,
On 2/15/06 11:14 PM, "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Any comments on this? Is he referring to EnterpriseDB extensions that
> they don't make public?
I've noticed a lot of press lately is mentioning their name next to ingres
as an alternative to MySQL, so the M
