Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-05 Thread Alessio Bragadini
On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 00:40, Bruce Momjian wrote: Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html Please note that you have an entry for Digital Unix and one for Compaq Tru64 while in fact they are the same OS that went through a whirlwind of

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us] Sent: 05 November 2002 03:18 To: Sean Chittenden Cc: Tom Lane; Larry Rosenman; PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Ports list updated: http

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-05 Thread Bruce Momjian
Dave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us] Sent: 05 November 2002 03:18 To: Sean Chittenden Cc: Tom Lane; Larry Rosenman; PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Ports list

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-05 Thread Bruce Momjian
Yes, now it is Digital/HP/Compaq. Updated to existing Tru64 entry. Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Alessio Bragadini wrote: On Tue, 2002-11-05 at

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-04 Thread Alessio Bragadini
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:22:42AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: I've committed fixes for the other issues too, so CVS tip should now pass cleanly on your platform. I've built the snapshot from CVS tip and now the regression tests pass with both GCC 2.95.1 and Compaq C V6.4-216 (dtk) on Digital UNIX

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Sean Chittenden wrote: Or at least it's *trying* to apply it for 4.7 --- as near as I can tell without testing, the

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Alessio Bragadini wrote: On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:22:42AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: I've committed fixes for the other

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-04 Thread Sean Chittenden
Or at least it's *trying* to apply it for 4.7 --- as near as I can tell without testing, the above scrap of resultmap code is wrong because both of the i.86 lines will match on FreeBSD 4.7, and I think the pg_regress coding will take the last match. Larry, did you actually test the

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-01 Thread Alessio Bragadini
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 18:53, Tom Lane wrote: Evidently main.c needs #include errno.h added. I wonder what have changed since Beta2 that compiled fine... Please add that and see if you get any further. Done, and now it builds (I've limited the test to native cc compiler for now). But it

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-01 Thread Tom Lane
Alessio Bragadini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 18:53, Tom Lane wrote: Evidently main.c needs #include errno.h added. I wonder what have changed since Beta2 that compiled fine... That is odd. main.c itself certainly has not changed. Done, and now it builds (I've limited

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-01 Thread Tom Lane
I said: The alter_table diff is clearly indicative of a bug. Can you set a breakpoint and discover exactly where calloc is blowing up? Never mind, I see it: psql is doing calloc(0) when presented with a table of zero columns. Surprising you're the first to try it on a platform where that

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 01:57, Sean Chittenden wrote: Seems like someone ought to issue a call for port reports. The supported platforms list hasn't been touched ... Good point. Thomas, can you take that on? No, at least not now. I'm not able to communicate reliably with the

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-01 Thread Tom Lane
Sean Chittenden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: $ uname -a FreeBSD avienda.nxad.com 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Mon Oct 28 18:20:14 PST 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DELLAPTOP i386 Looks like the only problem on beta3 is that the geometry bits are failing, but I'm not

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 09:53, Tom Lane wrote: Sean Chittenden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: $ uname -a FreeBSD avienda.nxad.com 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Mon Oct 28 18:20:14 PST 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DELLAPTOP i386 Looks like the only problem on beta3 is

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-01 Thread Tom Lane
Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 09:53, Tom Lane wrote: Or at least it's *trying* to apply it for 4.7 --- as near as I can tell without testing, the above scrap of resultmap code is wrong because both of the i.86 lines will match on FreeBSD 4.7, and I think the

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-31 Thread Alessio Bragadini
Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version number please. DOESN'T WORK on Digital Unix/Tru64 4.0g, with both cc or gcc compiler. Using Compaq C V6.4-216 (dtk) on Digital UNIX V4.0G (Rev. 1530) Compiler Driver V6.4-013 (dtk) cc Driver: make[3]: Entering directory

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-31 Thread Tom Lane
Alessio Bragadini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version number please. DOESN'T WORK on Digital Unix/Tru64 4.0g, with both cc or gcc compiler. Evidently main.c needs #include errno.h added. Please add that and see if you get any further.

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-31 Thread Sean Chittenden
Seems like someone ought to issue a call for port reports. The supported platforms list hasn't been touched ... Good point. Thomas, can you take that on? No, at least not now. I'm not able to communicate reliably with the mailing lists, and so can not coordinate anything :( Not

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-30 Thread Tara Piorkowski
Bruce, Not sure. I know Tom Lane ran a check on 10.1.x and didn't have any errors, so I figured the differences I saw reflected changes made by Apple between 10.1.x and 10.2.x. Then, I was surprised when I saw Adam's report, so I thought perhaps he was running on a PPC G3 and there were

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-30 Thread Adam Witney
On 29/10/02 1:50 pm, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Strange. I just got report from another OSX 10.2.1 user saying regression tests passed: 10.2.1, Adam Witney ([EMAIL PROTECTED] The proper value seems to be: 15.3864610140472 or

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-30 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have reviewed your diff and found that it was either timezone changes or join.sql which I have recently fixed. Can you grab current CVS snapshot and try again? --- Ian Barwick wrote: On Tuesday 29 October 2002 01:56,

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Magnus Naeslund(f)
Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed that the supported platforms listed 7.2 for linux alpha but with yesterdays date. I figured it was just a typo, but thought I would try to compile myself just to be sure, but I received 4 failures: horology,geometry,opr_sanity, and misc This is

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Robert Treat
On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 12:16, Magnus Naeslund(f) wrote: Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed that the supported platforms listed 7.2 for linux alpha but with yesterdays date. I figured it was just a typo, but thought I would try to compile myself just to be sure, but I received 4

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
[mailto:jason;tishler.net] Sent: 29 October 2002 14:48 To: Dave Page Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms I found a solution to the above which will hopefully find its way

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Ian Barwick
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 01:56, Bruce Momjian wrote: Sorry, Ian, here is the patch I applied. You can apply this to whatever version you are using and test Irix with that, rather than having to grab CVS. OK, I have carried out make check with the updated tests but got FAILED on the same

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us] Sent: 29 October 2002 04:24 To: Dave Page Cc: PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms I have updated CVS and re-added getopt.c, now

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Strange. I just got report from another OSX 10.2.1 user saying regression tests passed: 10.2.1, Adam Witney ([EMAIL PROTECTED] The proper value seems to be: 15.3864610140472 or 15.3864610140473 in

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Jason Tishler
Matthew, On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:50:40PM -0500, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: Are you compiling from CVS or from a released tarball? CVS. The bison requirement was recently raised to bison 1.5 or above (1.75 was recently released also.) This is an issue only when compiling from CVS, since

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Robert Treat
I noticed that the supported platforms listed 7.2 for linux alpha but with yesterdays date. I figured it was just a typo, but thought I would try to compile myself just to be sure, but I received 4 failures: horology,geometry,opr_sanity, and misc This is on alpha running debian 3 linux uname

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason;tishler.net] Sent: 29 October 2002 14:48 To: Dave Page Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms I found a solution

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason;tishler.net] Sent: 29 October 2002 18:58 To: Dave Page Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Hackers: As the Cygwin

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us] Sent: 29 October 2002 19:34 To: Dave Page Cc: PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Attached is a diff to fix the pclose problem

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Jason Tishler
Dave, On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:00:20PM -, Dave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason;tishler.net] Sent: 29 October 2002 18:58 Hackers: As the Cygwin release that is actively supported is the binary distribution that Jason builds, I would

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Tara Piorkowski
Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian writes: Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version number please. I've checked CVS tip on: HPUX 10.20, using both gcc and vendor's cc PPC Linux Mac OS X 10.1 Here's the regression.diffs file from Mac OS X 10.2.1 (Jaguar). It failed

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 05:32:04PM -0500, Andrew Sullivan wrote: Solaris 7, 2xUltraSPARC-II 400 MHz, 2.5 Gig, gcc 2.95.3; all tests pass. Solaris 8 forthcoming. I should have mentioned that this is for beta 3; I don't have the necessary bison installed to compile from CVS. Solaris 8,

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us] Sent: 26 October 2002 03:17 To: PostgreSQL-development Cc: Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us] Sent: 26 October 2002 03:17 To: PostgreSQL-development Cc: Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Jason Tishler
Dave, Thanks for the heads up... On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:31:00AM -, Dave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us] Sent: 26 October 2002 03:17 Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Folks. start sending in those

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
I thought the join was part of the timezone change, but I see now that it is separate. I will fix it by adding ORDER BY. --- Neil Conway wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ports list updated: Shouldn't

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason;tishler.net] Sent: 28 October 2002 13:33 To: Dave Page Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Dave, Thanks

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Tom Lane
Make installcheck also failed on horology, copy2 and domain - see attached output. The clocks changed here on Saturday night, so I guess that shouldn't have caused the first error (or should the docs be updated?). Horology failures are normal for a day or so on either side of a DST change

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl;sss.pgh.pa.us] Sent: 28 October 2002 15:53 To: Jason Tishler Cc: Dave Page; Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Pgsql-Cygwin Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Make installcheck also

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Jason Tishler
Dave, On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:56:01PM -, Dave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason;tishler.net] Sent: 28 October 2002 13:33 Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Please try with Cygwin 1.3.14-1 while I attempt to deal

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 10:20, Jason Tishler wrote: 2. Cygwin bison limit exceeded: make[4]: Entering directory `/home/jt/src/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc' [snip] bison -y -d preproc.y preproc.y:5560: fatal error: maximum table size (32767) exceeded I believe a new

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Tom Lane
Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Horology failures are normal for a day or so on either side of a DST change --- see the regression tests interpretation docs. I have no time right now to examine the other diffs. The docs say: Some of the queries in the timestamp test will fail if you

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Jason Tishler
Dave, On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:20:16AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:56:01PM -, Dave Page wrote: Ok, but this is going to take a while as few of the mirrors seem to have this release yet. I also need to download a new set of everything for reasons I won't go

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason;tishler.net] Sent: 28 October 2002 20:42 To: Dave Page Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Dave, On Mon, Oct 28

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 14:58, Dave Page wrote: My WAG is that you will be able to upgrade your Cygwin installation before I fix the Cygwin build issues. :,) I guess my WAG was wrong... :,) I've been meaning to ask this for a while - what exactly is a WAG? :-) Wild-A**ed-Guess, I

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 10:17:22PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: OK, Tom will be away next week, and Thomas will too. I can do it. Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version number please. Solaris 7, 2xUltraSPARC-II 400 MHz, 2.5 Gig, gcc 2.95.3; all tests pass. Solaris

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Neil Conway wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ports list updated: Shouldn't the join regression test failure be fixed? OK, I have updated the join regression test to add ORDER BY in the queries Irix differed. Ian, would you retest the CVS version of PostgreSQL to see if all

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Ian Barwick
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 00:08, Bruce Momjian wrote: Neil Conway wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ports list updated: Shouldn't the join regression test failure be fixed? OK, I have updated the join regression test to add ORDER BY in the queries Irix differed. Ian,

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Sorry, Ian, here is the patch I applied. You can apply this to whatever version you are using and test Irix with that, rather than having to grab CVS. --- Neil Conway wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ports

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Andrew Sullivan wrote: On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 10:17:22PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: OK, Tom will be away next week,

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Andrew Sullivan wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 05:32:04PM -0500, Andrew Sullivan wrote: Solaris 7, 2xUltraSPARC-II 400

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Magnus Naeslund(f)
Linux alpha. An Redhat 6.2, Linux gsX 2.4.19-pre6 #4 Thu Apr 11 07:17:39 CEST 2002 alpha unknown (ev56 ruffian). gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release) ./configure \ --prefix=/usr/local/pgsql-7.3b3 \ --with-maxbackends=512 \ --with-tcl \ --without-tk

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Magnus Naeslund(f) wrote: Linux alpha. An Redhat 6.2, Linux gsX 2.4.19-pre6 #4 Thu Apr 11 07:17:39 CEST 2002 alpha

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Matthew T. O'Connor
Are you compiling from CVS or from a released tarball? The bison requirement was recently raised to bison 1.5 or above (1.75 was recently released also.) This is an issue only when compiling from CVS, since the bison stuff is preprocessed for released tarballs. So you might want to try the just

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have updated CVS and re-added getopt.c, now in /port, and updated win32.mak. That should help. --- Dave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us] Sent: 26

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-27 Thread Ian Barwick
On Saturday 26 October 2002 04:17, Bruce Momjian wrote: OK, Tom will be away next week, and Thomas will too. I can do it. Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version number please. The current platform list is:

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Ian Barwick wrote: On Saturday 26 October 2002 04:17, Bruce Momjian wrote: OK, Tom will be away next week, and

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-27 Thread Neil Conway
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ports list updated: Shouldn't the join regression test failure be fixed? Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-27 Thread Magnus Naeslund(f)
On an rh6.2, Linux gsX 2.4.19-pre6 #4 Thu Apr 11 07:17:39 CEST 2002 alpha unknown (ev56 ruffian) i get this failure. Should ./configure options gmake gmake check be the only things i need to do? == creating database regression ==

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
Updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
Updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Doug McNaught wrote: Doug McNaught [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: OK, compile went fine, but I get multiple regression test failures:

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-26 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 04:01:17PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: Updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html Linux 2.4 on IA32 passes also. -- Alvaro Herrera (alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl) La felicidad no es maƱana. La felicidad es ahora

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Alvaro Herrera wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 04:01:17PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: Updated:

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-26 Thread Doug McNaught
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version number please. I've checked CVS tip on: HPUX 10.20, using both gcc and vendor's cc PPC Linux Mac OS X 10.1 I get the

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-26 Thread Tom Lane
Doug McNaught [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: make[3]: Entering directory `/home/doug/src/pgsql/src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/ascii_and_mic' gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -fpic -I../../../../../../src/include -c -o ascii_and_mic.o ascii_and_mic.c

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-26 Thread Doug McNaught
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Doug McNaught [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: make[3]: Entering directory `/home/doug/src/pgsql/src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/ascii_and_mic' gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -fpic -I../../../../../../src/include -c -o

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-26 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version number please. I've checked CVS tip on: HPUX 10.20, using both gcc and vendor's cc PPC Linux Mac OS X 10.1 regards, tom lane

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-26 Thread Stephan Szabo
On 26 Oct 2002, Doug McNaught wrote: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Doug McNaught [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: make[3]: Entering directory `/home/doug/src/pgsql/src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/ascii_and_mic' gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -fpic

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-26 Thread Doug McNaught
Doug McNaught [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: OK, compile went fine, but I get multiple regression test failures: test geometry ... FAILED After realizing that my disk had filled up (thanks Alvaro) I reran the tests and 'geometry' is the only failure. I'm guessing this is due to