David Fetter wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:19:59AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
Folks,
I've noticed that a big hunk of our build system has gratuitous
dependencies on some variety of shell and on tools like sed, none
of which makes Windows developers feel
Bruce Momjian wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:19:59AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
Folks,
I've noticed that a big hunk of our build system has gratuitous
dependencies on some variety of shell and on tools like sed, none
of which
David Fetter wrote:
Folks,
I've noticed that a big hunk of our build system has gratuitous
dependencies on some variety of shell and on tools like sed, none of
which makes Windows developers feel welcome. I know people are
working toward a cmake or other more cross-platform toolchain.
My
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My proposal is a lot more modest, and doesn't conflict with the larger
one. I'd like to move the above stuff to self-contained perl would
help to make things more cross-platform and clean up, no offense to
the fine authors, some pretty crufty code in
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:19:59AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
Folks,
I've noticed that a big hunk of our build system has gratuitous
dependencies on some variety of shell and on tools like sed, none
of which makes Windows developers feel welcome. I know people are
David Fetter wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:19:59AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
Folks,
I've noticed that a big hunk of our build system has gratuitous
dependencies on some variety of shell and on tools like sed, none
of which makes Windows developers feel
David Fetter wrote:
That new version stamper calls out to sed, when perl is perfectly
capable of doing the same work itself and not spawning 30 shells in
the process.
That's great. Please send a patch to improve the stamper. (Are you
really worried about its performance, given that it runs
David Fetter wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:19:59AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
Folks,
Well, it'll wind up with a build system that's documented a lot better
than it is :)
Is perl currently required to build from tarball? If not, you would
be placing an additional
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Fetter wrote:
This is 2008, and it's silly to pretend we need to support this
requirement on systems where people are building Postgres.
Maybe, or maybe not. Do these platforms all have Perl?
In this connection it might be worth pointing to the
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Maybe, or maybe not. Do these platforms all have Perl?
Of course. They're all buildfarm clients and the buildfarm script is
perl.
Kris Jurka
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Maybe, or maybe not. Do these platforms all have Perl?
gypsy_moth Solaris 8 SUN Studio 8 spar
If the moths don't have perl, we'll add it, no problem - don't let that
stop anything.
(On a separate note, we have had some problems internally with DNS, so
some
Jorgen Austvik wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Maybe, or maybe not. Do these platforms all have Perl?
gypsy_moth Solaris 8 SUN Studio 8 spar
If the moths don't have perl, we'll add it, no problem - don't let
that stop anything.
Of course they have perl - the buildfarm script is perl.
12 matches
Mail list logo
