Not that I'm aware of anyone making ...
On Fri, 17 May 2002, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since we will show PostgreSQL related stuff on Linuxtag in Germany next
> month, I'd like to get some PostgreSQL posters for the booth. But I have
> no idea where to find some.
>
> Do we have that kind
On 22 May 2002, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 10:51, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> > What isn't funny is Oliver Elphick's results on Debian, running glibc 2.2.5
> > (same as Red Hat 7.3's version).
>
> This is a completely different version. Once Debian updates (in a few
> years) they'll
On 22 May 2002, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 11:23, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Unix systems have
> > *always* interpreted time_t as a signed offset from the epoch.
>
> No. This always was an accident if it happens.
>
> > Do you
> > really think that when Unixen were first built in th
On Thu, 23 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On 22 May 2002, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 11:23, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >
> > > > Unix systems have
> > > > *always* interpreted time_t as a signed offset from the epoch.
> > >
> > > No. This always was an accident if it h
On Sat, 25 May 2002, Michael Meskes wrote:
> No, this is simply not true. The version number is what the upstream
> gives its release. No more no less. What RH does is becoming as subtly
> incompatible a possible. If that's the goal, it doesn't look like free
> software for me. Sure all changes a
You might want to go to the archives and catch up on the whole thread and
its digressions :)
On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> mlw wrote:
> > Like I told Marc, I don't care. You spec out what you want and I'll write it
> > for Windows.
> >
> > That being said, a SysV IPC interface for
FreeBSD
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Since we now have an official entry in /etc/services, shouldn't we be able
> > to make use of it, by using getservbyname() if a nonnumeric port number is
> > specified?
>
> Is any OS actually shipping us in /etc/serv
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Manfred Koizar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > No comment on a planned 7.3 timeframe? :-(
> >
> > I think we are planning to go beta in late summer (end of August, say).
> > Probably in July we'll start pressing people to finish up
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > Manfred Koizar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > > No comment on a planned 7.3 timeframe?
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I will say that I was disapointed by previous release delays and will be
> more vocal about moving things forward than I have in the past.
I don't know ... I kinda like being able to confidently say to clients
that "the latest release is always the most
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Yes, but there is a downside to this. We have trouble enough figuring
> out if a patch is a "feature" or "bug fix" during beta. How are people
> going to decide if a feature is "big" or not to work on during August?
> It has a paralyzing effect on our
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> It is the idea were are supposed to go into beta with a bug-free release
> that bother me.
But its you that's always tried to advocate that ... no? If not, then I
am confused, cause I know *I've* never ... to me, switching to beta mode
has always been
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Now, I don't want to apply a partially-implemented feature in the last
> > > week of August, but I don't want to slow things down during August,
> > > because the last time we did this w
On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I *really* wish ppl would stop harping on the length of the last beta
> > cycle ... I will always rather delay a release due to an *known*
> > outstanding bug, especi
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Agreed on all accounts ... which is why this time, I want to do a proper
> > > branch when beta starts ... hell, from what I've see
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> There is a downside to changing away from that approach. Bruce
> mentioned it but didn't really give it the prominence I think it
> deserves: beta mode encourages developers to work on testing, debugging,
> and oh yes documenting. Without that forced "non
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 2. Once Branch created, any *partially implemented* features will get
> >rip'd out of the -STABLE branch and only fixes to the existing, fully
> >implement features will go in
>
> Now, that is an interesting idea.
Ya, I thought it was when yo
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Jeroen T. Vermeulen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 10:41:32PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > I'm thinking we should just import the current state of the files
> > and not worry about preserving their change history.
>
> Fine with me, if that's easier. I just thought it mig
got it ... will try and incorporate it and see what I can come up with ...
thanks :)
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Jeroen T. Vermeulen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 09:15:05AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > >
> > > Jeroen ... can you send m
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
> As for current PostgreSQL organization, can someone explain me which W32
> port will make its way to PostgreSQL main source code?
Whichever one actually submits patches for review first that is deemed
acceptable for inclusion ... as its always been
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Jan Wieck wrote:
> > Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > As for current PostgreSQL organization, can someone explain me which W32 port
> > > will make its way to PostgreSQL main source code? Can someone publish a
> > > schedule for replication av
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
> Le Jeudi 20 Juin 2002 15:22, Tom Lane a écrit :
> > BTW, we do already have a recognized leadership group: the core
> > committee. The committee members mostly prefer to lead by example
> > and by consensus, rather than trying to impose their will
On 20 Jun 2002, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> Nobody is "in charge", but everybody is welcome to do it, even without
> being "elected" or "nominated ";)
>
> Still, having a "success stories" or "advocacy" section on
> www.postgresq.org seems like a good idea.
Being worked on ... we are actually working
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Jon Franz wrote:
> > It could be helpful to create a mailing list just for this project,
> > since not all members of pg-hackers will/shall participate, and we
> > would probably flood this list quite a bit trying to figure out what
> > is the best way
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> OK, I have finally decided that our archive searching stinks. I have
> emails in my mailbox that don't appear in the archives.
>
> Our main site, http://archives.postgresql.org/ doesn't archive the
> 'patches' list. (It isn't listed on the main site,
damn, I wish ppl would bring stuff like this up earlier :( I've just gone
through the configs, and think the problem(s) are fixed with this ... :(
On 21 Jun 2002, Alessio Bragadini wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 17:07, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > > Can we find ou
ignore this one ...
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
to ignore ...
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
Okay, just did a series of upgrades to the server to hopefully speed up
delivery a bit ... 6minutes more reasonable? let's see if it keeps up,
mind you ...
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> ignore this one ...
>
>
>
yup, as well as Francisco's ...
On 21 Jun 2002, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 22:06, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > Okay, just did a series of upgrades to the server to hopefully speed up
> > delivery a bit ... 6minutes more reasonable? let's s
Just a quick heads up ... I've asked Rackspace to investigate *why* the
server crashes every 24-48hrs, and given them carte-blanche to get it
fixed ... they are planning on swapping out/in hardware, as right now that
appears to be where the error messages are indicating ...
-
should already be fixed ...
On 23 Jun 2002, Dave Cramer wrote:
> I am getting lots of errors on pgadmin.postgresql.org
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
>
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > Can we link to the fts site?
>
> The only thing I can help with is the fts link, but I'm hesitant to
> link to something that disappears. If it's going to be here and not
> go away again I'll be happy to add it.
The only reason it "disappeared
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Frankly, my feeling is, as a "geek-to-geek" product, PostgreSQL is already
> > adequately marketed through our huge network of DBA users and code
> > contributors.
>
> Well, mumble ... it seems to me that we are de
will do it tonight :)
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Any chance of getting a pgsql-patches link on archives.postgresql.org?
> > I know the archives are created (I use them) but there is no obvious
> > link.
>
> > Secondly, could the links that
-patches added ... I've gotta redo that page, as it was just a
'quick-n-dirty' when I did it ...
On 27 Jun 2002, Rod Taylor wrote:
> > > Vince, we can get -advocacy listed on the web site? There has been no
> > > traffic over there until now, but there are ppl subscribed to it ...
> >
> > all
http://archives.postgresql.org/ ... better?
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> will do it tonight :)
>
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Any chance of getting a pgsql-patches link on archi
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/ ... better?
>
> Yup, although I'd suggest making the classification line up with
> the one on the main website --- docs and cygwi
On 27 Jun 2002, Rod Taylor wrote:
> > > Also, someone suggested listing the by-month indexes back-to-front
> > > (most recent month first), which seems like a great idea if not
> > > difficult.
> >
> > Better?
> >
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc
> >
> > The rest will 'fall in line'
shows up fine for me ... browser issue? :( is there a tag missing that
you can pick out in view source? *raised eyebrow*
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marc, did you do anything to the format of the individual archive
> message pages? The top index pages look great, but when I go to,
Is this sort of like Oracle guaranteeing its uncrackable, but as soon as
someone comes to them to prove it is, Oracle's response is "but DBA didn't
enable the obscure security feature that can be found here, that is
disabled by default?"
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Tim Hart wrote:
> Could very well be
On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday 28 June 2002 10:46 am, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Guido Ostkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I am sure, a lot of people would be happy, if those groups were
> > > officially introduced and hosted on many international newservers.
>
> > Yup. Are yo
On Sat, 29 Jun 2002, Guido Ostkamp wrote:
> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Guido Ostkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> I am sure, a lot of people would be happy, if those groups were
> >> officially introduced and hosted on many international newservers.
> >
> > Yup. Are you voluntee
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Curt Sampson wrote:
>
> While there are big changes between 7.2 and the next release, they
> aren't really any bigger than others during the 7.x series. I don't
> really feel that the next release is worth an 8.0 rather than a 7.3. But
> this is just an opinion; it's not somet
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Actually, the "big" change is such that will, at least as far as I'm
> > understanding it, break pretty much every front-end applicaiton ...
>
> Only thos
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > Actually, the "big" change is such that will, at least as far as I'm
> > understanding it, break pretty much every front-end applicaiton ... which,
> > I'm guessing, is pretty major, no? :)
>
> I've always thought of our release numbering as having "
On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 12:39:13PM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> >> One other usability note: why can't postmaster perform the steps of
> >> an initdb if -D points to an empty directory?
>
> > Rank newbies shouldn'
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, jtv wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 11:20:47PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > Has the author been given CVS access yet?
> >
> > Yes, he has. I got him in touch with Marc. I was just pointing out
> > that while he knows C++, he needs help getting the connecting stu
Just a test to make sure both are being used properly ... should help
increase overall list speeds ...
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Aug 2002, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
>
> > How long did it take you to teach him to say PostgreSQL ? :)
>
> Lessee, the conversation went something like this:
>
> Me: I need a wav file of you saying "PostgreSQL".
>
> Him: "PostgreSQL"?
>
> Me: Y
On Sun, 21 Jul 2002, Gustavo Gonzalez Giron wrote:
>
> Hello Dave... thank you for pay attention to our application.
>
> > Couple of questions?
>Couple of answers! :)
>
> > 1) Why did you choose the GPL license, I expect it cannot be added to
> > the postgres distribution with that license?
Best would be to get it added as a project on GBorg ... Chris is working
on changes to GBorg to allow a project to be added to the site *without*
it necessarily be 'hosted' there, so that projects like this, or PgAdmin,
can be tracked through on central location, without limiting the
developers t
Something to maybe add to the TODO list, if someone has the
time/inclination to work on it ...
The problem with the current auth system, as I see it, is that you can't
easily have seperate user lists and passwords per database ... its shared
across the system ...
The closest you can get is to h
d'oh, always helps go rotate those damn logs ... auto-rotation now in
place, shouldn't happen again for a good long time (had >6gig taken up in
very very big log files *sigh*) ...
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 12:43:52AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > since as soon as there are two 'bruce' users, only one can have a password
>
> I guess I don't understand why that's a problem. I mean, if
God, I go through 200+ of those almost daily as moderator ... imagine if
we had the lists open? :)
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I seem to be getting virus emails that pretend to be one of your guys. eg.
> I get them from T.Ishii and N.Conway, etc. Anyone
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > Something to maybe add to the TODO list, if someone has the
> > time/inclination to work on it ...
> >
> > The problem with the current auth system, as I see it, is that you can't
&
am looking at it now ... trying to figure out where we're using >30gig of
space righ tnow :(
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> When I try to do a cvs up I get this:
> can't create temporary directory /var/tmp/cvs-serv39998
> No space left on device
>
> And on th
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Actually, it is replaced by encrypted pg_shadow by default in 7.3, and
> the new USER (users or groups) column in pg_hba.conf that will be in 7.3
> that can restrict based on user/group. This replaces the use of the
> secondary file for just usernames.
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > First and foremost in my mind ... how do you have two users in the system
> > with seperate passwords? ...
> > since as soon as there are two 'bruce' us
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > First and foremost in my mind ... how do you have two users in the system
> > > with seperate passwords? ...
> > > since as so
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> Uh, we've *never* supported "two bruce users" ...
> >
> > > He was being tricky by having different passwords for the same user on
> > > each database, so one use
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > You seem to have done a nice job with the + and @ for 'maps' ... how about
> > third on that states that the map file has a username:password pair in it?
> >
> > I do like how the pg_hba.
using the following:
uvscan --analyse --recursive --mime --summary --program /var/spool/mail
On 28 Jul 2002, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 20:10, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > God, I go through 200+ of those almost daily as moderator ... imagine if
> > we had t
figured it out ... uvscan isn't looking where ports installed the newer
.dat files ... fixed that and it finds 63 virii infected files instead of
just 5 :)
one step closer ...
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>
> Okay, am playing with this on one of my 'non
Okay, this is sweet ... but can someone tell me where I 'Buy' a copy of
uvscan? I've searched McAfee, but can't seem to find it in their eStore
anywhere ...
On 28 Jul 2002, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 20:10, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> &
their
> site!
>
> Chris
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier
> > Sent: Wednesday, 31 July 2002 2:20 AM
> > To: Larry Rosenman
> > Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne; [EMAIL PRO
add in 'fix pg_hba.conf / password issues' to that too :)
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Here are the open items for 7.3. We have one more month to address them
> before beta.
>
> ---
>
>
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> * libpqxx is not integrated into build process nor docs. It should
> be integrated or reversed out before beta.
I've requestsed that Jeorgen(sp?) move this over to GBorg ... its
something that can, and should be, built seperately from the base
distribution
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 02:08:33PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > > One reason for wanting to integrate libpqxx is that I don't think we'll
> > > find out anyth
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Neil Conway wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 02:11:06AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > * libpqxx is not integrated into build process nor docs. It should
> > > be integrated or reversed out before be
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neil Conway) writes:
> > Mentioning that on -hackers would have been nice -- I've spent a while
> > this week hacking autoconf / Makefiles to integrate libpqxx...
>
> Marc's opinion is not the same thing as a done deal ;-) --- we still
> h
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Neil Conway wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 02:01:43AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > add in 'fix pg_hba.conf / password issues' to that too :)
>
> I doubt that will make 7.3 -- the proposals I've seen on this topic
> require some re
Okay ... since this is pretty much going to be 'one camp for, one camp
against' without anything to really back up either camps perspectives /
arguments, I did some research on CVS in order to find a nice, effective
middle ground ... and it actually works quite sweet ...
Basically, CVS let's you
I've just updated the README.cvsup file in order to reflect the changes,
to provide a sample of how to download the whole thing, as well as
instructions on how to do "just" a particular module:
[ Updated README.cvsup ]=
# This file represents the s
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> OK, I have thought about this. First, a possible solution would be to
> have a GUC variable that prepends the dbname to all username
> specifications, so the username becomes dbname.username. When you
> CREATE USER "test", it actually does CREATE USER
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> One idea I had was to look for a colon in the username, and if I see
> one, I assume everything after the colon is a password. Would that work
> for you?
That would definitely work ... but I *really* like your GUC idea ... it
would allow ppl to change
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Ron Snyder wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, is that your pg_hba.conf line? 'password' is insecure over
> > > networks you don't trust.
> >
> > Yes, we're using 'password password' in our pg_hba.conf file. I trust my
> > network (so far).
>
> That is another ma
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Okay ... since this is pretty much going to be 'one camp for, one camp
> > against' without anything to really back up either camps perspectives /
> > arguments, I did some research on CVS in order to find a nice, effective
> > middle ground
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Ron Snyder wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, is that your pg_hba.conf line? 'password' is insecure over
>
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Ron Snyder wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > I am working on it now. I decided against doing any kind of database
> > > prepending at the user level. You create the user as 'dbname.username'.
> > > That is clearer, rather
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > Access to nothing. I could actually try to quality by dbname.username,
> > > then fall back to just username, but that seems insecure.
> >
> > No, that's cool ... just questio
thanks for the heads up, fixed ... part of the generation code was flawed,
in that it tried to move a directory that didn't exist, failed and exited
the script *roll eyes* added in an 'if' to make sure the directory
exists, and am running it manually now ...
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, bpalmer wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > > > Access to nothing. I could actually try to quality by dbname.username,
> > > > > th
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Until we have folks who are excited enough about it to plan it out and
> > do the work, piecemeal rejection of components is not leading to a more
> > solid product.
>
> I'm lukewarm about whether to actually do
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> ...
> > *Eventually*, a simple checkout of 'pgsql' should result in a "server
> > only" distribution that we can pull bits and pieces into transparently ...
>
> I'm still not quite sure where this is headed or why, but if nothing
> else pgsql could an
... is once more 'normal' ...
there are three modules right now setup:
earthdistance
libpqxx
pgsql-server
pgsql combines all three of the above to transparently give the equivalent
of the whole distribution from its component parts ...
---(end of broadcast)-
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> I realize that Marc wasn't proposing splitting off any
> >> server-side code, but I still want to tread carefully about breaking
> >> up the codebase.
>
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ... is once more 'normal' ...
>
> Uh, it's completely broken as far as I can tell.
>
> $ pwd
> /home/postgres/pgsql/src/bin/pg_dump
> $ cvs statu
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Also, http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/ isn't working.
> >>
> >> What'r you typin about? It works fine. Ok, ok.. It does *NOW*. :)
>
> > Well, of course that specific URL doesn't work because it's
Should be fixed now ... I found a rsync.core file, so it looks like the
changes may have been more extensive then rsync could handle ... just ran
it manually (or, rather, am running as I type this), so by the time you
receive, a checkout should grab the right structures ...
Let me know if it wor
k properly, but
right now, other then gettin gat the sub-modules themselves, CVSup is
broken ... anon-cvs will fair you better ...
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Neil Conway wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 12:56:11AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > I've just updated the README.cvsup file
Just making sure that I haven't screwed up anything plugging in amavis ...
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
anti-virus software ... see http://www.amavis.org ...
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
> got it...
>
> what's amivis ?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier
> &g
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > So, from the 'client side', y'all will still see "everything as one big
> > package", while from the 'server side', I'll have the seperate modules
> > taht can be
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 10:39:47AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > Actually, plpgsql is pretty expensive too. The thing to be benchmarking
> > is applications of plain old built-in-C functions and operators.
>
> I thought part of the justification for
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Dann Corbit wrote:
> I have discussed the idea of contributing our Win32 work to the
> PostgreSQL project with management.
>
> We have also converted all of the utilities (initdb, psql, pg_dump,
> pg_restore, pg_id, pg_passwd, etc.)
>
> Management is (rightfully) concerned abo
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > > So, from the 'client side', y'all will still see "everything as one big
> > >
201 - 300 of 1762 matches
Mail list logo
